Issues: Smart Growth

In Contrast: Smart Growth versus Sprawl

  Intro text
Link to 1st photo contrast page
Link to 2nd photo contrast page
Link to 3rd photo contrast page
Link to 4th photo contrast page
Link to 5th photo contrast page


Photo of Sprawling Development

The need for increased driving in sprawling areas requires a massive and expensive network of highways and causes serious air pollution problems. As sprawl intensified between 1970 and 1990, the number of miles Americans drive each year doubled from one trillion to two trillion. In spite of continuing improvement in emission controls, highway vehicles still emit some 60 million tons of carbon monoxide every year as well as up to 50 percent of toxic air pollutants.

Photo of Smart Growth Development

People who live and work in smart-growth communities are only a short walk away from a bus, light rail, or train stop. Because of clustered development and dedicated bicycle lanes and trails, smart growth communities are also bicycle friendly. Supporters of smart growth celebrated the fact that funding for public transportation, bike paths, and sidewalks increased during most of the 1990s. But in the last two years, funding to build new roads grew by 21 percent while funds for transportation alternatives, such as this light rail line, fell by 19 percent.

Photos: Top, Chesapeake Bay Foundation; Bottom, Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Tri-Met)


Sign up for NRDC's online newsletter

See the latest issue >

Eat Local

Switchboard Blogs

Terrific analysis of LEED-ND by the National Trust
posted by Kaid Benfield, 12/2/08
Green, affordable, walkable, beautiful: Seattle’s High Point neighborhood
posted by Kaid Benfield, 12/1/08
How to tame a freeway - put a park on top
posted by Kaid Benfield, 11/28/08