Environmental Issues > Energy Main Page > All Energy Documents
Contaminated Coal Waste
The Monroe power plant in Monroe County, Michigan, ranks first in the state for total coal waste, and four-fifths of the contaminated coal waste is disposed of in ponds.
Coal Plants in Michigan
The five new coal plants proposed to be built in Michigan are projected by NRDC to generate 686,879 tons of contaminated coal waste, including 634 tons of toxic metals. Michigan ranks 10th in waste production expected from new coal plants, and 11th in toxic metals from those plants.
Michigan ranks 20th in the country for contaminated coal waste, with 2,129,700 tons of waste reported to the U.S. Energy Information Administration in 2005. The state also ranks 13th in toxic metals contaminating its coal waste, with 2,524 tons of toxic metals, based on NRDC estimates.
Statistics for Proposed Plants in Michigan
| Plant | County | Estimated tons of coal waste | Estimated tons of toxic metals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumers Energy | Bay | 210,373 | 194 |
| Great Lakes | Gratiot | 169,656 | 157 |
| Mid-Michigan | Midland | 153,482 | 142 |
| Wolverine | Presque Isle | 135,725 | 125 |
| Holland | Ottawa | 17,644 | 16 |
Statistics for Existing Plants in Michigan
| Plant | Owner (primary) | County | Tons of waste | Percent of waste disposed | Tons of toxic metals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monroe (DETED) | Detroit Edison Co | Monroe | 603,000 | 100.0% | 838 |
| J H Campbell (CEC) | Consumers Energy Co | Ottawa | 305,300 | 84.8% | 270 |
| Belle River | Detroit Edison Co | St Clair | 200,000 | 58.0% | 229 |
| St Clair | Detroit Edison Co | St Clair | 192,900 | 69.4% | 306 |
| Presque Isle | We Energies | Marquette | 146,600 | 56.0% | 188 |
| Trenton Channel | Detroit Edison Co | Wayne | 139,000 | 100.0% | 170 |
| Dan E Karn | Consumers Energy Co | Bay | 134,700 | 90.8% | 67 |
| B C Cobb | Consumers Energy Co | Muskegon | 101,300 | 100.0% | 64 |
| J R Whiting (CEC) | Consumers Energy Co | Monroe | 81,000 | 52.1% | 91 |
| J C Weadock | Consumers Energy Co | Bay | 77,700 | 100.0% | 166 |
| Escanaba Paper Company | NewPage Holding Corporation | Delta | 54,500 | 100.0% | 22 |
| Erickson Station | Lansing City of | Eaton | 41,500 | 61.7% | 43 |
| Eckert Station | Lansing City of | Ingham | 39,100 | 23.3% | 62 |
| Harbor Beach | Detroit Edison Co | Huron | 13,100 | 100.0% | 7 |
Percent of waste disposed indicates the proportion of contaminated coal waste disposed of in landfills, ponds, or on- or off-site disposal facilities. For detailed information on how each plant reported its waste disposal in 2005, see the detailed data Excel spreadsheet.
Sources: permit applications for new plants, Energy Information Administration data, NRDC estimates. The most recent data available from the EIA is from 2005 and it is possible that operational changes at particular plants will have changed the yearly waste volumes and disposal methods. Click here for detailed glossary of terms and our methodology.
The numbers presented on this and related webpages assume that proposed plants if built would be conventional coal-fired plants. Of the proposed plants included in the national data set, 13 might use gasification, a process that results in a different form of waste, with a much lower environmental risk. Click here for projections that exclude those plants from the overall waste numbers and rankings.
last revised 3/12/2009
Sign up for NRDC's online newsletter
Related Stories
- Efficient Appliances Save Energy -- and Money
- A consumer's guide to buying energy efficient appliances and electronics.



