In this Section
Issues > Energy Main Page > All Energy Documents
Contaminated Coal Waste
The Sherburne power plant in Sherburne County, Minnesota, ranks first in the state for total coal waste, with more than half of the contaminated coal waste disposed of in ponds.
Coal Plants in Minnesota
The one new coal plant proposed to be built in Minnesota is projected by NRDC to generate 136,403 tons of contaminated coal waste, including 126 tons of toxic metals. Minnesota ranks 30th in waste production expected from new coal plants, and 30th in toxic metals from those plants.
Minnesota ranks 26th in the country for contaminated coal waste, with 1,544,110 tons of waste reported to the U.S. Energy Information Administration in 2005. The state also ranks 28th in toxic metals contaminating its coal waste, with 1,021 tons of toxic metals, based on NRDC estimates.
Statistics for Proposed Plants in Minnesota
| Plant | County | Estimated tons of coal waste | Estimated tons of toxic metals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesaba IGCC | Itasca | 136,403 | 126 |
Statistics for Existing Plants in Minnesota
| Plant | Owner (primary) | County | Tons of waste | Percent of waste disposed | Tons of toxic metals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sherburne County | Northern States Power Co | Sherburne | 939,500 | 98.6% | 505 |
| Clay Boswell Energy Center | Minnesota Power Inc | Itasca | 281,200 | 100.0% | 214 |
| Allen S King | Northern States Power Co | Washington | 76,000 | 50.8% | 39 |
| Riverside (NSP) | Northern States Power Co | Hennepin | 60,400 | 35.1% | 66 |
| Black Dog | Northern States Power Co | Dakota | 45,000 | 12.9% | 49 |
| High Bridge | Northern States Power Co | Ramsey | 39,810 | 3.0% | 24 |
| Taconite Harbor Energy Center | Minnesota Power Inc | Cook | 32,800 | 100.0% | 45 |
| Silver Bay Power Co. | Cleveland Cliffs Inc | Lake | 27,500 | 100.0% | 27 |
| Hoot Lake | Otter Tail Power Co | Otter Tail | 21,700 | 100.0% | 32 |
| Syl Laskin | Minnesota Power Inc | St Louis | 20,200 | 100.0% | 22 |
Percent of waste disposed indicates the proportion of contaminated coal waste disposed of in landfills, ponds, or on- or off-site disposal facilities. For detailed information on how each plant reported its waste disposal in 2005, see the detailed data Excel spreadsheet.
Sources: permit applications for new plants, Energy Information Administration data, NRDC estimates. The most recent data available from the EIA is from 2005 and it is possible that operational changes at particular plants will have changed the yearly waste volumes and disposal methods. Click here for detailed glossary of terms and our methodology.
The numbers presented on this and related webpages assume that proposed plants if built would be conventional coal-fired plants. Of the proposed plants included in the national data set, 13 might use gasification, a process that results in a different form of waste, with a much lower environmental risk. Click here for projections that exclude those plants from the overall waste numbers and rankings.
last revised 3/12/2009
Sign up for NRDC's online newsletter
Take Online Action Now!
Related NRDC Press Releases
Related Stories
- Efficient Appliances Save Energy -- and Money
- A consumer's guide to buying energy efficient appliances and electronics.
- Living Green: Here Comes the Sun
- Finally, good affordable solar power for the rest of us.
Related Links
Find Your Favorite NRDC website
- Global Warming & Energy:
- Beat the Heat
- Activism:
- Save BioGems
- NRDC Action Fund
- Ocean Protection:
- Your Oceans
- Green, Healthy Living:
- Simple Steps
- Smarter Cities
- This Green Life
- Green Paws
- NRDC Cool Sites:
- It's Your Nature
- GreenDay+NRDC
- For Kids:
- Green Squad

