Issues > Energy Main Page > All Energy Documents

The Sherburne power plant in Sherburne County, Minnesota, ranks first in the state for total coal waste, with more than half of the contaminated coal waste disposed of in ponds.

Coal Plants in Minnesota

The one new coal plant proposed to be built in Minnesota is projected by NRDC to generate 136,403 tons of contaminated coal waste, including 126 tons of toxic metals. Minnesota ranks 30th in waste production expected from new coal plants, and 30th in toxic metals from those plants.

Minnesota ranks 26th in the country for contaminated coal waste, with 1,544,110 tons of waste reported to the U.S. Energy Information Administration in 2005. The state also ranks 28th in toxic metals contaminating its coal waste, with 1,021 tons of toxic metals, based on NRDC estimates.

Back to the main overview »

Statistics for Proposed Plants in Minnesota

Plant County Estimated tons of coal waste Estimated tons of toxic metals
Mesaba IGCCItasca136,403126

Statistics for Existing Plants in Minnesota

Plant Owner (primary) County Tons of waste Percent of waste disposed Tons of toxic metals
Sherburne CountyNorthern States Power CoSherburne939,50098.6%505
Clay Boswell Energy CenterMinnesota Power IncItasca281,200100.0%214
Allen S KingNorthern States Power CoWashington76,00050.8%39
Riverside (NSP)Northern States Power CoHennepin60,40035.1%66
Black DogNorthern States Power CoDakota45,00012.9%49
High BridgeNorthern States Power CoRamsey39,8103.0%24
Taconite Harbor Energy CenterMinnesota Power IncCook32,800100.0%45
Silver Bay Power Co.Cleveland Cliffs IncLake27,500100.0%27
Hoot LakeOtter Tail Power CoOtter Tail21,700100.0%32
Syl LaskinMinnesota Power IncSt Louis20,200100.0%22

Percent of waste disposed indicates the proportion of contaminated coal waste disposed of in landfills, ponds, or on- or off-site disposal facilities. For detailed information on how each plant reported its waste disposal in 2005, see the detailed data Excel spreadsheet.

Sources: permit applications for new plants, Energy Information Administration data, NRDC estimates. The most recent data available from the EIA is from 2005 and it is possible that operational changes at particular plants will have changed the yearly waste volumes and disposal methods. Click here for detailed glossary of terms and our methodology.

The numbers presented on this and related webpages assume that proposed plants if built would be conventional coal-fired plants. Of the proposed plants included in the national data set, 13 might use gasification, a process that results in a different form of waste, with a much lower environmental risk. Click here for projections that exclude those plants from the overall waste numbers and rankings.

last revised 3/12/2009

All Tags [ View Popular Tags ]:
AB 1493
agriculture
air pollution
algae
Appalachia
appliances
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
asthma
auto industry
automakers
biodiesel
biofuels
biogas
biomass
birds
boreal forest
bush administration
California
California environmental legislation
Canada
cap 2.0
cap and trade
carbon offsets
caribou
cars
case studies
causes of global warming
CCS
china
clean energy
clean energy economy
clean vehicles
cleantech
climate legislation
coal
coal-fired power plants
compact fluorescent lighting
conservation and restoration
consumer products
demand side management
diesel
diesel buses
diesel exhaust
dirty fuels
drilling
economy
efficient vehicles
electric utilities
electricity industry
energy efficiency
energy policy
energy security
environmental history
ethanol
florida
Forests
fuel
fuel economy
fuel efficiency standards
fuel savings
gas drilling
gas prices
gasoline
global warming
global warming emissions
global warming legislation
green buildings
green business
green jobs
health
health effects
household energy use
human health
hybrid
hybrid cars
hybrid vehicles
hybrids
hydrogen
hydropower
indoor air quality
jobs
Kids' Health
landfill gas
lead
liquid coal
livestock farms
location efficient mortgages
Los Angeles
mercury
methane
mining
Missouri
mountains
mountaintop removal mining
mtr
natural gas
NEPA
new energy economy
New York
New York City
nitrogen oxides
nrdc offices
nuclear energy
Obama
oceans
offshore drilling
oil
oil drilling
oil shale
open space
particulate pollution
photos
polar bears
policy
pollution
power plants
public lands
public transportation
renewable energy
renewable fuel
renewables
respiratory illness
Rocky Mountains
smart growth
smog
solar power
solutions
soot
sulfur dioxide
tar sands
tennessee
toxic waste
transportation
tv
tvs
vehicle
vehicles
water efficiency
water management
Water Pollution
western water
what you can do
wind power
wind turbines

Sign up for NRDC's online newsletter

See the latest issue >

Clean Energy Common Sense - Buy Now
Eat Local

Related Stories

Efficient Appliances Save Energy -- and Money
A consumer's guide to buying energy efficient appliances and electronics.
Living Green: Here Comes the Sun
Finally, good affordable solar power for the rest of us.

Find NRDC on
YouTube