Environmental Issues > Energy Main Page > All Energy Documents


  • Under the EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan, states are afforded an almost unprecedented degree of flexibility to meet the standard in a manner that reflects the unique conditions in any given state. Florida has no shortage of cost-effective clean solutions to meet its energy needs while also reducing carbon and other pollution.
  • The question before policymakers is whether to pursue a constructive State Plan that maximizes the job creation, economic development, and emissions reduction potential of energy efficiency and renewable energy, or one that puts the interests of the fossil industry before those of Floridians.
  • Florida can seize the opportunity presented by the EPA's Clean Power Plan to respond to the challenge of climate change while taking advantage of its renewables and efficiency potential.

On June 2, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the Clean Power Plan, which establishes standards for carbon emissions from existing power plants. Despite its significant contribution to the climate change that threatens Florida's infrastructure and economy, carbon pollution has never before been limited by the EPA, unlike co-pollutants sulfur and mercury. Under the Clean Power Plan, each state is required to reduce the carbon intensity of its power fleet between 2020 and 2030. This report aims to examine Florida's electricity sector, past resource allocations, and various paths the state may follow to comply with the Clean Power Plan.

In 2012, Florida's power sector emitted about 1,200 pounds of carbon dioxide pollution for every megawatt-hour (MWh) of electricity produced. For the sources that will be affected by the Clean Power Plan, this amounts to 108 million metric tons, equal to the yearly pollution from more than 22 million cars. Given the Clean Power Plan's current proposed targets, Florida would be required to reduce the intensity of its electricity resources (including resources provided by demand-side energy efficiency measures) to 740 pounds per MWh. The state may decide how to achieve these reductions, using any measures it chooses to reduce fossil power plant carbon pollution. Florida can choose measures best suited to its resources and economy and join in multi-state/regional approaches to compliance.

The EPA based each state's target on a limited set of actions, or "building blocks." These include:

  • reducing statewide demand for electricity through efficiency programs;
  • adding renewable energy like solar and wind;
  • running gas plants -- which emit less carbon and other air pollutants -- more frequently;
  • improving the efficiency of existing coal plants.

But, states are free to pursue these or any other measures as long as their plan demonsrates that it can achieve the assigned target.

The overall costs -- and net benefits -- of complying with the Clean Energy Plan will be driven by Florida's choices in drafting and submitting its state plan to EPA. In a directly related proceeding currently before the Florida Public Service Commission, these very questions are being deliberated on, with the state's major utilities proposing to drastically reduce already anemic energy efficiency programs and, instead, saddle consumers with the bill for massive new investments in fossil fuel infrastructure. The outcomes of that case will have a direct bearing on Florida compliance.

Florida can seize the opportunity presented by the EPA's Clean Power Plan to respond to the challenge of climate change while taking advantage of its renewables and efficiency potential. By crafting a plan that finally begins to capture these untapped resources at the appropriate pace, Florida can create jobs, promote innovation in nascent industries, and become more resilient through the diversification of its energy system.

last revised 8/14/2014

All Tags [ View Popular Tags ]:
60mpg
AB 1493
AB 32
agriculture
air pollution
air toxics
alabama
algae
AliyaHaq
alternative fuels
AnthonySwift
Appalachia
appliances
Arctic
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
asthma
automakers
aviation
beaches
biochar
biodiesel
biofuels
biogas
biomass
birds
boreal forest
BrianSiu
budget
CaiSteger
California
California environmental legislation
Canada
cap 2.0
cap and trade
carbon footprint
carbon offsets
carbon pollution
cars
case studies
causes of global warming
CCS
CFLs
Chile
china
CHP
Clean air
Clean Air Act
clean energy
clean energy economy
clean power plan
clean vehicles
climate
climate change
climate legislation
clothes dryers
cloud computing
coal
coal-fired power plants
compact fluorescent lighting
compact fluorescents
computer equipment
Congress
consumer products
coral
cover crop
CPS
DabbieHammel
Danielle Droitsch
DanielleDroitsch
data centers
DebbieHammel
deforestation
DerekMurrow
DevraWang
DianeBailey
diesel
diesel buses
diesel exhaust
dirty fuels
dod
dolphins
drilling
economy
efficiency
efficient light bulbs
efficient vehicles
electric cars
electric utilities
electric vehicles
electricity
electricity and natural gas utlities
ElizabethShope
emissions
energy efficiency
energy efficiency standard
energy efficient buildings
energy efficient light bulbs
energy effiency
energy policy
energy security
energyappropriations
energyapprops
energy-efficient bulbs
environmental history
environmental protection agency
EPA
ethanol
finance
fish & fishing
FL
florida
Forests
fracking
fracking risks
FranzMetzner
fuel
fuel economy
fuel efficiency
fuel efficiency standards
fuel savings
gas drilling
gas prices
gasoline
gis
global warming
global warming and the economy
global warming emissions
global warming legislation
global warming pollution
globalwarming
green building
green buildings
green business
green jobs
green sports
greenhouse gas emissions
Gulf
gulf of mexico
gulfofmexico
gulfspill
halogen bulbs
halogen lightbulbs
health
health effects
home energy
home networks
household energy use
HUD
human health
Hurricane Katrina
hybrid
hybrid electric vehicles
hybrid vehicles
hybrids
hydraulic fractring
hydraulic fracturing
hydrogen
incandescent lighbulbs
incandescent light bulbs
India
India Initiative
indoor air quality
infrastructure efficiency
interiorappropriations
interiorapprops
JacksonMorris
jobs
KatharineMcCormick
keystone
Keystone XL
Kids' Health
KXL
Latin America
LCFS
lead
LEDs
light
light bulbs
light emitting diodes
liquid coal
livestock farms
location efficiency
Los Angeles
louisiana
LukeTonachel
mapping
Marcellus Shale
Massachusetts
mercury
methane
Mexico
mid-Atlantic
mining
MiriamRotkinEllman
mississippi
Missouri
Montana
mountains
mountaintop removal mining
mtr
natural gas
natural gas drilling
NEPA
New York
nitrogen oxides
NoahHorowitz
North Dakota
Northeast states
nrdc offices
nuclear energy
oceans
offshore
offshore drilling
offshore oil
ohio
oil
oil and gas industry
oil drilling
oil shale
oil spill
oil spills
oilspill
open space
ozone
particulate pollution
PatRemick
pennsylvania
photos
PierreDelforge
pipeline
policy
pollution
power plants
PTC
public lands
public transportation
rail
RalphCavanaugh
refrigerants
regional greenhouse gas initiative
regulatory reform
renewable energy
renewable fuel
renewables
residential small networks
respiratory illness
RGGI
riders
Rocky Mountains
RPS
SamanthaWilliams
SashaLyuste
SashaStashwick
SB 315
schools
server rooms
servers
shell
SierraMartinez
smart biomass
smart grid
smart growth
smog
smog air pollution
solar
solar power
solutions
soot
Southeast
StarlaYeh
sulfur dioxide
SusanCasey-Lefkowitz
sustainable sourcing
TanjaSrebotnjak
tar sands
tar sands pipeline
tar sands; keystone xl
tax incentives
tax subsidies
television
tennessee
texas
toxic waste
trailbreaker
transit
transportation
transportation bill
trasnportation
tv
tvs
utilities
VEETC
vehicle
vehicle emissions
vehicles
video game consoles
wastewater
water efficiency
Water Pollution
wetlands
whales
what you can do
wind
wind power
wind turbines
Share | |
Find NRDC on
YouTube