|
Toxic Trade: The Global Metallic Mercury Market
Mercury, a potent neurotoxin, does not observe international borders. Unlike some other pollutants, airborne mercury can travel great distances before being deposited in waterways. Once the mercury enters a waterway, naturally occurring bacteria absorb it and convert it to a form called methyl mercury and it then moves up the food chain into fish. As a result, mercury escaping from outdated chemical factories in, say, India can easily turn up in fish caught by anglers in the U.S. Great Lakes or sold at a Manhattan grocery store. That's why the global problem of mercury pollution needs a global solution. Mercury Poses Serious Health Hazards The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that every year hundreds of thousands of American newborns are at risk for problems with fine motor skills and learning difficulties as a result of their mothers' fish consumption during pregnancy. Emerging research also links mercury exposure with cardiovascular disease in adult men, and scientists continue to raise flags about additional health threats posed by mercury exposure. Where Mercury Comes From Coal-burning power plants are the most common source of mercury pollution. Coal is naturally contaminated with mercury, and when it is burned, the mercury simply goes up the smokestack and into the air. Another very significant source of mercury pollution is metallic mercury, used in a number of commercial products and industrial processes. The most polluting of these uses include chemical manufacturing (chlor-alkali plants), battery manufacturing, small-scale gold mining, and production of switches, measuring devices, and other products. In recent decades, developed nations have substantially reduced their use of this highly toxic metal. However, the surpluses created by declining industrial use of mercury have too often been allowed to flood the global marketplace. And this cheap mercury has fueled a sharp increase in the use of mercury in developing nations. According to a recent study for the European Commission, nearly 3,700 metric tonnes of mercury are purchased around the world each year for various industrial purposes. This global mercury trade continues despite the fact that non-mercury-based alternatives are readily available for most current uses. For example, chlor-alkali plants, which use mercury to convert salt to chlorine gas and caustic (lye), are a significant source of mercury pollution throughout the world, including in the United States. Every bit of that is needless pollution, however, because non-mercury-based processes can yield the same products without the use of mercury. The heavy use of mercury in the developing world has created a serious pollution problem that will only be solved by a cooperative international effort. Most developing nations have no effective regulations to protect exposed workers and the environment. And, of course, since mercury travels so easily, mercury pollution in the developing world is a problem the world over. Simply put, the current laissez-faire global market in this toxic substance is a dangerous threat to the world's children -- it endangers this generation and will threaten future generations. The Major Mercury Suppliers and Buyers There are four main pathways by which mercury arrives on the global market: "virgin" mercury mining; "by-product" mercury recovered from mining other metals such as silver, copper, or zinc; "recovered/recycled" mercury removed from products or processes; and "inventory mercury" from preexisting stockpiles and storage. Key players in the international mercury trade include:
Information Gaps Make It Hard to Track the Mercury Trade Following the trail of mercury across multiple borders can be difficult. A quantity of mercury might be recovered from a Western European mercury-cell chlor-alkali plant, sold to a Spanish mercury mining and trading company, shipped to Germany for conversion into mercuric oxide, and sold to mainland China for the manufacture of button-cell batteries. The batteries could then be exported to Hong Kong for incorporation into mass-produced watches that are then shipped to the United States or the European Union. This sort of globetrotting traffic in mercury greatly diminishes the positive impact of rules that a developed country may have put in place to eliminate sources of mercury pollution within its borders. Existing methods for tracking the global mercury trade are inadequate, sometimes failing to provide adequate or consistent data. For instance, the Concorde East West report for the European Commission notes that Mexico stated that it had imported 1,197 tonnes of mercury from the United States in 2000, and 1,340 tonnes in 2001. For those same years, the United States documented exporting only 7 and 12 tonnes, respectively, to Mexico. Meanwhile, the U.S. Geological Survey used to carefully track mercury use within the United States but has stopped collecting this data. Better tracking systems are crucial to understanding the impact of the global mercury trade and to creating responsible solutions. An International Solution for an International Problem Given the complex web of the mercury trade -- and the dangers associated with using mercury -- the international community needs to take several immediate actions:
These steps will ratchet down worldwide mercury supply and demand in a manner that will result in its gradual phase-out. Analysis shows that global mercury demand can be reduced by 50 percent by 2010 and 75 percent by 2015 without undue disruption of commerce. Not until 2015 will technology innovation and transfer be required to eliminate the remaining 25 percent of current use. A Stronger U.S. Policy Is Needed To date, U.S. policy on mercury has been ill-advised, both domestically and internationally. President Bush's "Clear Skies" proposal would let coal-burning power plants in the United States pollute longer and more heavily, and recent rules for emissions from the chlor-alkali sector failed to address the bulk of the mercury used in and escaping from these plants. The story is no better on the international front: At the most recent United Nations Environment Program negotiation meeting on mercury, the United States opposed establishing targets or goals for global reductions and did not support any coordinated strategy to reduce global supply or demand. Instead of stalling and resisting, a strong U.S. mercury policy would commit the federal government to:
Related NRDC Pages last revised 3.1.06 |
||||||||||











Print this Page
E-mail this Article


