Environmental News: Media Center
SPRINGFIELD, IL (Novermber 29, 2011) — Today, the Illinois Senate voted to force Illinois citizens and businesses to purchase power from a proposed coal plant operated by Tenaska, an out-of-state corporation. The bill, SB 678, has been repeatedly rejected due to concerns about the exorbitant cost of the project, the huge amounts of new pollution it may emit, and the unproven nature of its pollution controls. Today, power politics prevailed over these concerns.
"Just in time for the holidays, the General Assembly is literally delivering a lump of coal to the people of Illinois,” said Shannon Fisk of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). “Merry Christmas---enjoy unnecessarily increased electricity bills! Happy Hanukkah---here's a massive pollution plume! But Tenaska gets the biggest gift of all - a guaranteed profit funded by individuals and business throughout Illinois.”
Illinois consumers would be expected to pay up to seven times today's market price for electricity to subsidize this out of state company. Even if the plant is built on time and without overruns, this will amount to a $286-million increase in electric rates every year for the next 30 years.
“This terrible burden on families and on businesses is going to have devastating consequences on our economy and will cost Illinois thousands of jobs, including lost manufacturing jobs across the state”, commented Jack Darin, Director of Sierra Club Illinois. “We’ve created over 14,000 renewable energy jobs in Illinois by encouraging competition, protecting ratepayers, and investing in proven technology. That’s the smart way to create clean energy jobs, without jeopardizing our health and Springfield picking the winners that the rest of us are forced to subsidize.”
Illinois EPA recently estimated Tenaska’s potential at over 10 billion pounds per year, including health-threatening lead and mercury. Tenaska itself admits to IEPA that the pollution control plan in SB678 is “not commercially available”.
“Our Senators bowed to political pressure and special interests, supporting a bill that is unequivocally bad policy”, asserted Bruce Ratain, Clean Energy Associate with Environment Illinois. “While this plant was marketed as clean coal, this was just a masquerade. In this case, you can put a dirty pig in a tuxedo, but it's still just a dirty pig. Tenaska's bill should have never been let out of its pen” argued Ratain.
All three environmental groups oppose the Tenaska bill, and are urging the Illinois House to do the same.
“The House can show some serious leadership by putting an end to yet another special interest smudge on the state”, concluded Fisk.