Environmental News: Media CenterMain page | Archive
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Press contact: John Walke, NRDC, 202-425-4633 or Elliott Negin, 202-997-1472; Diane Maple, American Lung Association, 202-785-3355; Scott Kuhn, Communities for a Better Environment, 323-826-9771 ext. 108; Keri Powell, Earthjustice, 202-667-4500 x 209 or Cat Lazaroff, 202-667-4500 x 213; Janea Scott, Environmental Defense, 212-505-2100; Nat Mund, Sierra Club, 202-675-2397 or Brian O'Malley, 202-675-6279; Zachary Corrigan, U.S. PIRG, 202-276-0159
If you are not a member of the press, please write to us at email@example.com or see our contact page.
Federal Court Blocks Bush Administration Plan to Cripple Key Clean Air Act Provision
Court to Review Legality of Changes to New Source Review
WASHINGTON (December 24, 2003) -- A federal court today dealt a major blow to the Bush administration's plan to gut a key provision of the Clean Air Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals granted a coalition of environmental groups' motion to stay implementation of a loophole in the law's new source review program that would allow thousands of aging power plants and other industrial facilities to emit more air pollution, threatening the health of millions of Americans. The court will not lift the stay unless it ultimately decides the administration's rule change is legal.
"The administration's rule change would allow industry to renovate facilities in ways that dramatically increase air pollution without installing up-to-date pollution controls or even notifying nearby residents," said Keri Powell, an attorney at Earthjustice. "The stay will prevent industry from taking advantage of this illegal loophole while the court challenge is pending." Earthjustice is representing the American Lung Association, Communities for a Better Environment, Environmental Defense, NRDC (the Natural Resources Defense Council), Sierra Club and U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) in the case.
To obtain a stay, the environmental groups had to demonstrate that they were likely to prevail in their legal challenge to the rule. In addition, they had to show that their members would suffer irreparable harm if the court allowed the rules to go into effect. The court rarely grants requests to stay regulations pending judicial review.
If the court had not issued a stay, the new rules would have gone into effect on December 26 in at least 17 states and territories, including California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Nevada and Pennsylvania. Industrial facilities in those states would have been able to take advantage of the new air pollution loophole immediately.
"This is a great Christmas gift. The court has delivered tidings of joy to all Americans and a lump of coal to the Bush administration and its polluter friends," said John Walke, director of NRDC's Air Program.
The new source review program was designed to curb air pollution from industrial facilities by requiring them to install up-to-date pollution controls whenever they made physical or operational changes that increased air pollution. Many of the nation's older power plants have operated long beyond their expected lifespan, polluting at excessively high levels, largely because utilities have rebuilt these grandfathered plants over time. Often they modified these facilities in ways that increased air pollution without complying with Clean Air Act requirements to install modern emissions controls. The Environmental Protection Agency launched enforcement lawsuits against utility and refinery violators during the latter part of the Clinton administration for pollution increases that had resulted in millions of tons of air pollution.
The Bush administration is trying to derail these enforcement suits and eliminate future actions by changing the rules to allow companies to virtually rebuild their facilities and boost pollution levels without having to meet new source review program requirements. The loophole created by the new EPA rule would allow more than 20,000 power plants, refineries and other industrial facilities to replace existing equipment with "functionally equivalent" equipment without undergoing the clean air reviews required by the new source review program if the cost of the replacement does not exceed 20 percent of that of the entire "process unit." This exemption would apply even if a facility's air pollution increased by thousands or tens of thousands of tons as a result of the replacement.
"Today's victory means that hundreds of thousands of children, who would otherwise have suffered countless asthma attacks because of this clean air rollback, can now breath more freely," said Zachary Corrigan, staff attorney at U.S. PIRG.
The Natural Resources Defense Council is a national, non-profit organization of scientists, lawyers and environmental specialists dedicated to protecting public health and the environment. Founded in 1970, NRDC has more than 550,000 members nationwide, served from offices in New York, Washington, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Related NRDC Pages
The Bush Administration's Air Pollution Plan
Get Updates and Alerts
NRDC Gets Top Ratings from the Charity Watchdogs
- Charity Navigator awards NRDC its 4-star top rating.
- Worth magazine named NRDC one of America's 100 best charities.
- NRDC meets the highest standards of the Wise Giving Alliance of the Better Business Bureau.