Environmental News: Media CenterMain page | Archive
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE [En Español]
Press contact: Daniel Hinerfeld, 310-434-2303; cell 310-710-3111
If you are not a member of the press, please write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org or see our contact page.
WAVES OF FILTH: L.A. COUNTY BEACH CLOSINGS HIT RECORD HIGH FOR SECOND YEAR AS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FIGHT CLEANUP PLAN
Contamination Forces More Beach Closings Nationwide
L.A. City Lauded for Passing $500 Million Stormwater Bond
LOS ANGELES (July 28, 2005) -- Beach closings due to hazardous bacterial contamination in Los Angeles County hit a record high in 2004 for the second consecutive year, as many local governments continued using taxpayer dollars to block a regional urban runoff cleanup plan adopted in 2001. That finding is part of an annual report released today by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) called "Testing the Waters," which covers ocean, bay and Great Lakes beaches nationwide.
The report found nearly 20,000 closing and advisory days across the country in 2004. That's the most since NRDC began tracking the problem 15 years ago. One reason, the group says, is that improved monitoring spurred by earlier reports is now uncovering the true extent of the pollution problem.
The County of Los Angeles and 44 cities from Signal Hill to Santa Clarita, and West Covina to Beverly Hills earned themselves the dubious distinction of "Beach Bums" in this year's report for opposing plans to control urban runoff, Southern California's top source of beach pollution. Although many of these jurisdictions are inland, their runoff, laden with trash and bacteria, flows directly to the beach, where it contaminates coastal water.
"We're swimming in trash while elected officials spend our taxes to oppose pollution cleanup," said Anjali Jaiswal, an attorney in NRDC's Coastal Water Quality Project. "They're actually investing in contamination and it's enough to make you sick."
Local governments have spent a small fortune so far in a failed attempt to fight the regional cleanup plan in court. The plan improves on past stormwater control schemes by requiring measurable improvement in coastal water quality and not merely a proof of effort by cities, industry and developers. The 44 cities have spent at least $1.34 million in four lawsuits against the plan, according to official records turned over to NRDC. However, that sum doesn't include the considerable expenditures of Los Angeles County, which challenged the cleanup plan separately, but refused requests by NRDC for an accounting of its legal costs. All five lawsuits were rejected by a Los Angeles Superior Court judge in March, but the county and many of the cities are appealing.
City of L.A. Named "Beach Buddy"
On the other hand, "Testing the Waters" names the City of Los Angeles a "Beach Buddy" for putting Proposition O on the ballot last November. The Proposition, which passed with more than 76 percent of the vote, dedicates $500 million to reducing the garbage, toxic chemicals and dangerous bacteria that pollute rivers and beaches.
"In November, the people of Los Angeles took a big step toward cleaning up our polluted water," said Los Angeles City Councilmember Jan Perry (CD 9), Chair of the Environmental Quality and Waste Management Committee and co-author of the ballot measure. "Prop. O ensures that our beaches, streams and rivers will be safe for residents to enjoy, and it sets an example for other cities to follow."
Proposition O will fund capital projects such as stormwater treatment plants, stormwater and runoff diversion structures, catch and silt removal basins and drain filters.
"Instead of closing our beaches, let's clean up the water," said David Beckman, director of NRDC's Coastal Water Quality Project. "Authorities have gotten better at finding the problem. Now they need to stop the pollution at its source by repairing and replacing leaky sewage and septic systems, and cleaning up contaminated runoff. That's the only way to protect public health, the environment and California's gigantic tourist economy."
Total travel spending in California was $82.5 billion in 2004, according to the economic and market research firm, Dean Runyan Associates.
Another national organization, Surfrider Foundation, released its 2005 "State of the Beach" report today, which provides information on beach ecology, access, erosion and water quality, including material from NRDC's report and other sources. The report can be viewed by clicking here.
L.A. and Statewide Beach Data
"Testing the Waters" shows that in 2004, Los Angeles County had 1,469 closing and advisory days, the most since 1999, when more comprehensive statewide monitoring requirements went into effect, and the most statewide for the second consecutive year. As compared with 2003, the closing and advisories only increased by 1 percent in 2004 to 1,469 from 1,459. However, closing and advisory days increased more than 60 percent in 2004 compared with 2002, when there were 913.
The monitoring data revealed that 97 percent (1,423) of advisory days in 2004 were due to elevated bacteria levels, the same percentage as in 2003. Most of these (99.7 percent) were from unknown sources of contamination. Less than 1 percent (4) was from reported storm water sources. The remaining advisory days (25) were preemptive due to rain. There were 21 days of preemptive beach closings due to known sewage contamination events.
L.A. County was followed by the counties of Orange, San Diego, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Sonoma, Monterey and San Luis Obispo in the total number of beach closing and advisory days. Statewide, there was a 26 percent decrease in 2004. Closing and advisory days in San Francisco hit a record, jumping 35 percent. Of the 10 counties reporting decreases, San Diego, Orange and Ventura account for more than three quarters of the total decrease from 2003. Detailed results for all counties are available in the report.
National Beach Data
"Testing the Waters" found the states with the biggest jump in closing and advisory days over 2003 were Texas (1,074 percent), Washington (700 percent), Maryland (405 percent), Minnesota (333 percent), Michigan (174 percent), New York (117 percent) and Illinois (102 percent). Hawaii went from no closing or advisory days in 2003 to 1,169 in 2004; Maine went from none in 2003 to 56 in 2004. Nationally the number jumped 9 percent, from 18,224 days in 2003 to 19,950 days in 2004.
"This is a nationwide problem that demands a nationwide solution," said Nancy Stoner, director of NRDC's Clean Water Project. "We need stronger enforcement for those who aren't doing their share, and we need more federal help for local communities to control runoff and update their aging sewage systems. Just this week, Congress cut the Clean Water State Revolving Fund, the main federal support for water infrastructure. We're going backward." (For more information on the state revolving fund's status, click here.)
Eighty-five percent of the closing and advisory days were prompted by high bacteria levels, indicating the presence of human or animal waste. The main culprits are improperly treated sewage and bacteria-contaminated stormwater runoff. The bacteria cause a wide range of diseases, including gastroenteritis; dysentery; hepatitis; ear, nose and throat problems; and respiratory ailments. Consequences are worse for children, the elderly, pregnant women and anyone with a weakened immune system.
Polluted beachwater not only poses a threat to public health, it can hurt local businesses. Ocean-related economic activity alone contributed more than $200 billion to the U.S. economy in 2000, and coastal tourism and recreation are two of the fastest growing businesses in the country, according to the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. But U.S. "beachanomics" would be even more robust if communities were not forced to close their beaches because of pollution. For example, one study cited in NRDC's report estimated that closing a beach on Lake Michigan could result in losses as high as $37,000 per day.
Reasons for the jump in closings and advisories last year include:
- the continuing failure of most municipalities to identify and fix pollution sources;
- more frequent monitoring, prompted at least in part by earlier NRDC reports;
- heavier than average rainfall in some states, which flushed more pollution into local waterways;
- implementation of the federal Beaches Environmental Assessment, Closure and Health (BEACH) Act, which passed in 2000 and went into effect in early 2004. The law requires all coastal and Great Lakes states and U.S. territories to adopt the Environmental Protection Agency's recommended bacterial standards, provides grants for monitoring and public notification programs, and requires the EPA to make beachwater quality data easily accessible.
Beach Buddies and Beach Bums
NRDC's report identifies the best and worst performers when it comes to protecting beachgoers from contaminated water. NRDC named its annual Beach Buddies -- jurisdictions that monitor beachwater quality regularly, close beaches or notify the public when at least one of EPA's health standards is exceeded, and take significant steps to reduce pollution. This year's Beach Buddies are:
- the City of Los Angeles;
- Scarborough State Beach, Rhode Island (between Narragansett and Point Judith); and
- Door County, Wisconsin (northeast of Green Bay).
The annual list of Beach Bums -- communities that do not monitor pollution and warn the public when beachwater is unsafe, or fail to control sources of pollution -- include:
- The County of Los Angeles and 44 cities in the county, including Beverly Hills, Torrance, Monrovia, and Signal Hill (click here for the complete list);
- Van Buren County, Michigan (west of Kalamazoo on Lake Michigan); and
- Atlantic Beach, North Carolina (south of Morehead City).
"These two groups represent the best and worst in water quality and health safeguards for beachgoers," said Mark Dorfman, the author of the NRDC report. "They are case studies in what, and what not, to do to protect the 180 million Americans who come out to enjoy the beaches each year."
The report calls on Congress to fully fund the BEACH Act and the Clean Water State Revolving Fund, the principal source of federal support for water infrastructure. The report also urges the Environmental Protection Agency to tighten controls on sewer overflows and stormwater discharges, ensure that states and localities monitor water quality and notify the public when it does not meet bacterial standards, and set standards to protect the public from waterborne pathogens.
At the state and local level, NRDC recommends that governments adopt rigorous monitoring and beach closure programs, identify pollution sources, and get to work cleaning them up. In addition, authorities should issue advisories when heavy rainfall causes bacteria levels to jump, and when sewer overflows or other similar problems jeopardize beachwater safety.
Citizens also can do a number of things to improve beachwater quality, including capturing runoff from roofs and driveways; maintaining septic systems; picking up pet waste; avoiding chemical fertilizers and pesticides on lawns and gardens; and supporting legislation and funding to keep beachwater clean, fix aging sewer systems, and protect wetlands and coastal vegetation.
The Natural Resources Defense Council is a national, nonprofit organization of scientists, lawyers and environmental specialists dedicated to protecting public health and the environment. Founded in 1970, NRDC has more than 1 million members and online activists nationwide, served from offices in New York, Washington, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Related NRDC Pages, English
Summary of Findings
Guide to Finding Clean Beaches
Report: Testing the Waters 2005
National Press Release
California | Chicago | Florida | L.A. | N.Y.
Página Relacionadas de NRDC, En Español
Sumario de Hallazgos
Guía para Encontrar Playas Limpias
Reporte: Examinando las Aguas 2005 (Resumen Ejecutive)
Comunicado de Prensa
Comunicados de Prensa para
California | Chicago | Florida | L.A. | N.Y.
|Go to Top|
Sign up for NRDC's online newsletter
NRDC Gets Top Ratings from the Charity Watchdogs
- Charity Navigator awards NRDC its 4-star top rating.
- Worth magazine named NRDC one of America's 100 best charities.
- NRDC meets the highest standards of the Wise Giving Alliance of the Better Business Bureau.