The High Cost of P&G's Inaction
More than 100 days after P&G’s voting shareholders sent an overwhelming message to the company to stop fueling deforestation and forest degradation, P&G still...
Expert Blog
The latest opinion and analysis from NRDC’s science, legal, and policy experts.
How P&G Can Create a More Sustainable, Ethical Supply Chain
It's been one month since 67% of voting shareholders called on P&G to stop fueling forest destruction in its supply chains, and the company has yet to respond w...
Investors' Directive to P&G: Stop Driving Deforestation
Yesterday, in a landslide vote, 67% of Procter & Gamble's voting shareholders issued a clear directive to the company: stop destroying forests for your products...
How Shareholders Can Hold P&G to Account on Forests
On Tuesday, October 13th, P&G shareholders, including some of the world's biggest asset managers, will have the chance to vote to hold P&G accountable to elimin...
Flushing Forests Is Risky Business for P&G
A shareholder resolution that is up for a vote in P&G's next shareholder meeting shows that investors increasingly see P&G's unsustainable sourcing as a risk....
P&G, You Can't Outsource Sustainability
P&G's new commitment misses the mark. Until the company gets its own house in order by addressing its role in forest destruction, they will continue to put our ...
Páginas
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- siguiente ›
- última »