ANCHORAGE (January 15, 2013) – Completing a three -year scientific peer-reviewed process, EPA issued its final Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment today, concluding that Pebble Mine would have “significant” and even “catastrophic” impacts – including the certain dewatering, destruction, and pollution of the Bristol Bay watershed. The proposed Pebble Mine would destroy up to 94 miles of streams, devastate up to 5.350 acres of wetlands, ponds and lakes, harm a native lifestyle dependent on subsistence fishing, and threaten a salmon industry that generates $480 million in direct economic expenditures in 2009 and supports 14,000 jobs. The mine faces more than 80 percent local opposition and lost its key funder, Anglo American, last year.
Joel Reynolds, western director of the Natural Resources Defense Council, made the following statement:
“This is a scientific indictment of the Pebble Mine – or any other large-scale mining in the Bristol Bay watershed. The assessment documents what we’ve feared for years—Pebble Mine would destroy the world-class wild salmon fishery, cost jobs and endanger the communities and wildlife that depend on it.
“The watershed assessment is objective, clear and grounded in sound science. It was conducted over several years and confirms what the residents of the region have long understood: that large scale mining in this place would pose an unacceptable risk.
“The time for study is over. It’s now up to EPA to take regulatory action to stop the Pebble Mine. It’s time for EPA to protect American jobs and a vibrant salmon industry by taking action under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act to permanently protect the fishery and water resources of Bristol Bay – and the economic engine and environmental, social, and cultural resources that they sustain.”
Proposed at the headwaters of the world’s greatest wild salmon fishery, Pebble Mine would threaten the region’s internationally renowned salmon runs. Every year, an average of 37.5 million wild sockeye return to Bristol Bay, making up nearly half of the world’s supply of sockeye salmon. Salmon are the economic, cultural, and ecological linchpin of the region, supporting a wild salmon fishery that generates nearly $480 million in direct economic expenditures and employs 14,000 workers, a traditional native subsistence lifestyle, and vibrant wildlife. The proposed mine would risk this economic, cultural and ecological powerhouse by gouging one of the world's largest gold and copper mines out of the headwaters of Bristol Bay. It would generate up to 10 billion tons of contaminated waste that would have to be stored in perpetuity at the headwaters of the region’s famed salmon runs.
Anglo American withdrew from the project in September 2013, walking away from over $540 million invested and a $1.5 billion commitment. Mitsubishi Corporation sold out in 2011. Rio Tinto announced in December 2013 that it would undertake a strategic review, including possible divestment, of its 19% shareholding in Northern Dynasty Minerals, now the sole owner of Pebble Mine after Anglo’s departure. Rio Tinto’s announcement came after it received letters from the California State Controller and New York City Comptroller urging it to divest. Those letters noted the public opposition, reputational risk, environmental risk, and regulatory risk facing Pebble Mine.
EPA’s assessment is another hurdle facing the already beleaguered mine. EPA has taken precaution to ensure that its assessment represents the most comprehensive science regarding large-scale mining in the Bristol Bay watershed. The agency’s process has taken more than three years and has involved two rounds of review by independent scientists, numerous public hearings, and two public comment periods that generated more than 1.1 million comments. During the second comment period alone, more than 650,000 people supported EPA’s findings, including 84% of Alaskans and 98% of Bristol Bay residents who submitted written comments.