10 Reasons the New Trump Budget Is Bad for the Environment

The plan downsizes the EPA, guts research spending, and completely ignores climate change.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

President Trump released the fiscal 2019 budget yesterday, and it’s a doozy for the environment. The analysis will continue over coming days, but here are a few bad news items for the environment that jump out right away.

  1. Climate change is only mentioned when describing eliminated or cut programs.
  2. The plan downsizes key environmental regulatory agencies, for example cutting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's budget by 24 percent and eliminating 2,000 staff positions.
  3. It offers up $233 million to drill for oil and gas as well as mine for coal on America’s public lands, a 28 percent increase over current levels.  
  4. Clean water projects in rural communities would suffer. Funding for the USDA Rural Utility Service water and wastewater grants program was cut entirely.
  5. It further tarnishes our role as a onetime global environmental leader by axing the Global Climate Change Initiative, a program that financially supports climate change programs in developing countries.
  6. It hurts indigenous communities by slashing grants toward water and wastewater infrastructure projects on indigenous lands by more than $100 million.
  7. Funding for both the Chesapeake Bay and Great Lakes restoration efforts are cut by 90 percent in the EPA’s budget.
  8. The EPA’s portion of the Global Change Research program, which coordinates federal research on our changing climate, has been eliminated.
  9. The important role of science at the EPA would continue to dwindle as the agency’s research office faces a 48 percent cut.
  10. And the plan favors the oil and coal industries by cutting the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office's budget by $1.3 billion, eliminating the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy on cutting-edge energy technology and increasing the Fossil Energy Office's budget by $81 million. 

However, this budget is far from a done deal. The specifics will undoubtedly be fought, which leaves room for lawmakers to negotiate a better deal for the environment.

onEarth Story

Congressional Republicans are still doing their damnedest to ignore climate science.

onEarth Story

Scott Pruitt and Ryan Zinke are courting chaos—and calling it a victory for good governance.

onEarth Story

Just how badly has Trump damaged the agencies that protect our environment in the short time he’s been in the White House?

Policy Primer

Let’s not forget what America looked like before we had the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Our rivers caught on fire, our air was full of smog, and it stank (literally).

Policy Primer

Trump likens our “inner cities” to war zones . . . then guts the programs geared to safeguard clean air and water for low-income communities of color.

onEarth Story

A recent ruling on methane emissions serves as a smackdown to Pruitt’s EPA—and a way forward for environmentalists.

What's At Stake

The regulations that protect Americans’ health, economy, and environment now need our protection.

onEarth Story

The White House wants to nix grants that help local governments protect their citizens from pollution.

Midwest Dispatch

This Southeast Side community has helped give a voice to the environmental justice movement. Now Trump’s budget cuts threaten to silence it.

onEarth Story

The Trump administration has the money to fly Scott Pruitt first class, but not enough for renewable energy or climate change research?

onEarth Story

The Department of Transportation’s TIGER program helps communities thrive by funding innovative transportation projects. Congress shouldn’t let Trump do away with it.

Join Us

When you sign up you'll become a member of NRDC's Activist Network. We will keep you informed with the latest alerts and progress reports.