Don’t Drink the Farm

Agriculture runoff is choking Lake Erie. Are lawmakers finally ready to tell farmers to knock it off?

October 02, 2014

Photo: NASA Earth Observatory

Toxic algae blooms choke Lake Erie almost every year. But this August, that algae made its way into Toledo's drinking water, leaving more than 400,000 people without their taps for two days and making headlines across the country.

Now the scientists and public officials who have been warning about Lake Erie's problems for years are determined to finally do something about it. And that means farmers, they're looking at you.

Fertilizer runoff from farms (and suburban lawns) contains high levels of phosphorous. The nutrient feeds algae, allowing it to reproduce rapidly, killing oxygen and aquatic wildlife. Climate change is only going to make this problem worse (see “When It Rains, It Poisons”). So this week, the Great Lakes Commission, which is appointed by the region's governors and lawmakers to develop environmental and economic policies, announced that it wants to reduce the amount of phosphorus reaching Lake Erie by at least 40 percent.

“When half a million people lose their drinking water for a few days, that’s a wake up call,” executive director Tim Eder says. “It’s an indication that something’s not working.”

The Clean Water Act already limits how much cities and industry can dump into waterways. But the law doesn’t apply to agriculture, because runoff is considered a “nonpoint source” of pollution. The vast majority—91 percent—of the nutrients entering Lake Erie, however, now come from nonpoint sources. (The Environmental Protection Agency is working to address this problem through a new Clean Water Act rule that would cover headwaters and streams.)

For now, governments around the Great Lakes rely on voluntary programs, often actually paying farmers to keep phosphorous runoff levels in check. That’s a really expensive strategy—we’re talking billions of dollars, the commission says. And if one thing is clear in this green, murky mess, it’s that those policies aren’t working.

The 40 percent reduction recommended by the commission is, unfortunately, just a recommendation. The group doesn't have the power to enforce its suggestions. What it does have, says Eder, is a direct line to state legislators. Hopefully, he says, those lawmakers will listen. A green lake might not have been enough to get their attention, but 400,000 voters without drinking water is a whole different matter.

Urge your governor to take action to fight harmful algal blooms


onEarth provides reporting and analysis about environmental science, policy, and culture. All opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or positions of NRDC. Learn more or follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Guide

From fertilizer runoff to methane emissions, large-scale industrial agriculture pollution takes a toll on the environment.

Midwest Dispatch

With the manure of one mega-dairy already contaminating the water supply and another operation on the drawing board, Central Sands residents have had enough.

Rockies Dispatch

In the small city of Great Falls, residents push back against a Big Ag plant that would consume 3.5 million gallons of water—and produce 102,995 pounds of waste—per day.

Midwest Dispatch

Here are billions of new reasons Congress shouldn’t go soft on ballast water.

Midwest Dispatch

As the state’s dairy farms get bigger, cow poop is polluting Lake Michigan and people’s drinking water.

Personal Action

Natural solutions like mulch, cover crops, vinegar, and a little elbow grease will help keep the chemicals out of your garden—and your body.

Join Us

When you sign up you'll become a member of NRDC's Activist Network. We will keep you informed with the latest alerts and progress reports.