If you want to test the pharmacokinetics of a drug, you can have as many mice as you want. Looking to improve photovoltaic cells? Take all the sunshine and semiconductors you need. Want to study climate change? Now you have a problem—there’s only one planet earth. That’s the biggest difficulty for a climatologist: Predicting precisely how atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations will impact the climate and sea level in the next century is extremely difficult with only one earth to study. The entire discipline boils down to solving this single problem.
One approach is to travel through space. The carbon dioxide–rich atmosphere of Venus, whose 900-degree Fahrenheit surface makes life impossible, helped climatologists appreciate the power of greenhouse gases. Another possibility is to travel through time, reconstructing “past earths” and studying how their climates changed in response to different atmospheric conditions. The more past earths we can build, the better we can understand our current climate and how it’s about to change.
Take glaciations, or ice ages. The planet has cycled between heavy ice coverage and relative warmth four times over the past 450,000 years. On a graph, like the one below, the cycles look fairly consistent—long glacial periods interspersed with shorter spikes of heat. Climatologists call this a “sawtooth” pattern.
The only thing this graphs shows, though, is atmospheric temperature changes. Just as important is the melting and sea-level rise that come with them. Our understanding of those consequences comes almost exclusively from the last transition between glacial and interglacial periods, which happened about 20,000 years ago. First came a 2,000-year period during which huge icebergs broke away from ice sheets in the North Atlantic. (Paleoclimatologists call these phenomena “Heinrich events,” and this one is known as “Heinrich Stadial 1.”) Then, as both atmospheric carbon dioxide and trapped energy from the sun increased, there were two periods of rapid glacial melting, separated by a few thousands years of cold.
Climatologists have basically assumed that this is how deglaciation works, because the last transition was the only one we knew anything about. Today, in the journal Nature, a team of researchers in Australia and the United Kingdom gave us our first glimpse of the previous deglaciation, which happened about 135,000 years ago.
By observing the ratio of different isotopes of oxygen contained in mineral deposits in caves, combined with the known radioactive decay rates that generate those isotopes, the authors were able to construct a precise timeline of events, such as the melting of ice sheets and the deposit of previously ice-bound minerals on the floor of the ocean.
The research shows that not every deglaciation is the same. In fact, the transition that happened 135,000 years ago was quite complicated. The Southern Hemisphere warmed rapidly, while the northern half of the globe remained relatively cool due to slow ocean circulation. (Warming in one hemisphere coupled with cooling in the other is known as a polar seesaw.) During this period, the Antarctic ice sheet melted, creating the rather odd phenomenon—at least from the north’s perspective—of rising sea levels accompanied by relatively cool temperatures.
If you’re looking for a neat conclusion about how these new findings prove that global warming is real or that New York will be underwater in 50 years, you’re going to be disappointed. We’ve gone from understanding a single deglaciation to understanding two. This study is just a building block toward figuring out how our ice will melt as the planet warms.
But it’s also about something even bigger than that: It’s about how the atmosphere, the oceans, and the cryosphere (the frozen stuff on our planet) interact. It’s about finding a reason that we swing between freezing and melting and then back to freezing every 100,000 years or so. In other words, it’s about finally understanding how this rock we live on works.
onEarth provides reporting and analysis about environmental science, policy, and culture. All opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or positions of NRDC. Learn more or follow us on Facebook and Twitter.