Following the U.S. Department of the Interior's reinterpretation (and effective gutting) of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act last December, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has now canceled a long-term review that would provide more scientific analysis of the bedrock conservation law. The review, which began in 2015, would have examined what the environmental impact might be if the law permitted incidental takings (i.e. unintentional killings) of migratory birds. The MBTA has always been enforced to prevent both intentional and incidental takings of migratory birds. So if you, say, spill more than three million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico and kill a million birds doing so, you would have expected big MBTA penalties. But late last year, the Trump administration issued an opinion that only intentional takings of birds should be punishable. The substantial rollback, and the subsequent cancellation of the FWS review, are both discouraging moves away from urgent conservation work: Worldwide, 40 percent of avian species are in decline, and a recent study shows one in eight bird species are threatened with extinction.
Skip carousel items
Expert BlogUnited StatesKatie Umekubo
Today, NRDC and the National Wildlife Federation, along with the National Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity and American Bird Conservancy, filed a lawsuit to stop Interior Secretary Zinke from gutting the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
The Trump administration is once again trying to allow industry to cut corners, this time by setting bird-conservation efforts back decades.
Expert BlogKatie Umekubo
As we were about to celebrate the 100th anniversary of this landmark conservation law, the Trump administration decided to gut the MBTA by limiting its reach to the purposeful or intentional killing of birds.