Environmental Issues > Energy Main Page > All Energy Documents

America spends more than $200,000 per minute on foreign oil -- $13 million per hour. More than $25 billion a year goes for Persian Gulf imports alone. This NRDC analysis considers oil demand and supply projections and how our current policy of oil dependence effects our economy and security.

America's dependence on oil is a threat to our national security and our economy. Growing demand and shrinking domestic production means America is importing more and more oil each year - much of it from the world's most unfriendly or unstable regions. We spend more than $200,000 per minute -- $13 million per hour -- on foreign oil, and more than $25 billion a year on Persian Gulf imports alone.1 By October 2004, Americans had shelled out $249 per capita to foreign oil-interests.2

With U.S. gasoline consumption accounting for 11 percent of world oil production, the U.S. has been hit hard by our dependence on oil, intensifying our economic and political vulnerability. Of the $54 billion trade deficit reported in August, more than a fifth or $12 billion is from imported crude oil.3 Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has called the higher value of imported oil a tax on U.S. citizens that has cost us three quarters of a percent of our economic output in 2004, and warned economic impacts for the U.S. will intensify if current trends in oil demand and prices continue.4

Countries on U.S. oil purchases are spending heavily in Washington to make sure the party doesn't end: Since December 2003, OPEC has spent $13.3 million on federal lobbying, $6.6 million of which from Saudi Arabia alone.5 U.S. energy companies are jumping on the political bandwagon too, spending $59.4 million on lobbying in 2003 and $29 million on campaign contributions in the 2002 and 2004 election cycles.6

The immediate result of these contributions is an energy bill currently before Congress that would leave the country more dependent on oil imports, not less. It would invite oil drillers into some of America's last pristine wilderness areas to eke out a relative trickle of oil, while severely shortchanging conservation and efficiency efforts. And this plan would rely even more on shaky overseas governments, exposing us to greater security risks in the name of unrestrained consumption.

In fact, we simply cannot drill our way out of this problem (Figure 1). The U.S. has just three percent of know oil reserves; even drilling in the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would increase those reserves by less than one-third of one percent. Meanwhile, even OPEC is quickly exhausting excess production capacity according to the Federal Reserve. Looking beyond OPEC offers no comfort. Investment in new production capacity continues to lag in non-OPEC countries, limiting any near-term growth in output.7

Figure 1

Graph of Proven Oil Reserves Through 2025

In short, the system has reached its limit. Today's oil use outpaces new oil discoveries, with the world using about 12 billion more barrels per year than it finds.8 The growing imbalance between supply and demand means record high crude prices and the threat of more skyrocketing costs caused by even mild supply disruptions.

The only real solution is to reduce our demand for oil and therefore the economic and security risks of dependence on imports. It starts with increasing the efficiency of our cars and trucks, and developing more renewable sources of energy. Using technology available right now, America can save 2.5 million barrels of oil each day. Solutions range from better tires to cutting edge hybrid technology.

We've done it before: Passenger car and light truck fuel efficiency increased 70 percent between 1975, when the fuel economy law was originally enacted, and its peak in 1987. Since then we've been moving backward. Overall mileage of our new cars and trucks has steadily dropped. Today it's at its lowest level in 20 years.

Hooked on Oil

While domestic oil production peaked in the 1970s, consumption continues to grow at break-neck speed. In 2025 the U.S. is projected to consume 28.3 million barrels a day -- 44 percent more oil than we do today, with domestic production meeting a mere 30 percent of that need (see figure 2).

Figure 2

Graph of U.S. Dependence on Imported Oil, 1970 to 2025

Other countries will increasingly compete with the U.S. for the oil available for export. Consumption by industrializing nations will double over the next 25 years, from 15 to 32 million barrels a day. To meet projected world demand of 118 million barrels a day in 2025, global oil output would have to expand by more than 50 percent -- 40 million barrels per day -- between 2002 and 2025.

For example, China's per-capita oil consumption is just six percent of the U.S. figure. But rapid industrialization and a growing consumer demand mean China's thirst for imported oil is likely to quadruple from less than 2 million barrels per day in 2004 to nearly 8 million barrels per day by 2020 (see figure 3).9

Figure 3

Graph of China's Dependence on Imported Oil, 2000 to 2020

The growing problem is not lost on the Chinese government. China recently took an important step towards reducing their booming demand by creating a new system of fuel economy standards that U.S. experts say are more stringent than our own.10

Closer to Home: How Oil Addiction Drains the Economy

With stubbornly high prices, the U.S. economy is feeling the drag of dependence. In the first nine months of 2004, the U.S. exported $72.5 billion for oil.11 Every day the U.S. pays out $390 million for foreign oil, with half of every dollar going to OPEC and a quarter to the Persian Gulf (see figure 4). While some of those dollars could make their way back into the U.S. economy, recent trends suggest that those paid out to OPEC will not be reinvested here.12 And OPEC countries are profiting handsomely from surging oil prices; in fact, they are expected to pocket $300 billion by the end of the year.13

Figure 4

Graph of Daily U.S. Spending on Oil Imports in 2004

The high costs of oil have been passed on to consumers at the pump, through more expensive goods and services, and in a weaker job market and lower stock prices.14 Economist Philip Verleger finds that oil price spikes have cumulatively sapped 15 percent of our economy's growth since the Second World War, resulting in $1.2 trillion in direct losses.15 The total economic penalty of our oil dependence, including loss of jobs, output, and tax revenues, is estimated to be between $297 and $305 billion annually.16

Where's a Gas Station When You Need One?

Arab OPEC states supply the United States with 2.5 million barrels per day -- 25 percent of our daily imports. Unless things change, the future holds more of the same: The Middle East countries hold two thirds of the world's proven oil reserves.17 By 2025, the Middle East is expected to supply 36 percent of the world's oil, with OPEC as a whole producing 46 percent.18

Attempting to address this challenge, the Bush administration national energy policy targets eight nations for increased government investment and closer political alliances as alternative oil suppliers.19 But these eight nations -- Angola, Azerbaijan, Colombia, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Nigeria, Russia and Venezuela - have just a fraction of the oil reserves of the countries they're meant to counter (Figure 5).

Figure 5

Graph of Proven Oil Reserves at End of 2003

Total proven reserves of these countries, 198 billion barrels, is 70 percent lower than Persian Gulf reserves, with only 30 years of remaining reserves at 2003 production levels.20 In comparison, the Persian Gulf has almost 100 years of proven reserves at 2003 production levels. And all the major alternative players face significant political and social instability and remain porous to global terrorism, making it difficult to attract foreign investments necessary to increase production.21

Take Nigeria: Nigeria currently supplies the United States with 11 percent of daily imports.22 The West African nation has been wracked with political and environmental strife since it declared independence from Britain in 1960, and remains seriously unstable today. Recent rebel activity spurred Shell Oil to evacuate employees and drove oil to a record highs.23 Nigeria currently produces approximately 2.2 million barrels per day and holds three percent of world oil reserves.24

Or Venezuela: The United States receives 13 percent of its daily oil imports from Venezuela, slightly less than our imports from Saudi Arabia.25 This South American country has faced numerous labor and street demonstrations in recent years. Leftist President Hugo Chavez has cracked down on such activities, but at one point in 2002 even he was forced to flee the presidential palace for the security of a military base.26 A second general strike is late 2002 and early 2003 involved 18,000 workers for the state oil company, causing jittery markets and price spikes.27 More recently, Chavez suddenly increased taxes on foreign oil producers from one percent to 17 percent, claiming that "We are no longer going to give away our oil."28 Venezuela produces 2.99 million barrels of oil per day and holds 6.8 percent of the world's proven oil reserves.

Or Russia: Although Russia supplies only 1.5 percent of our daily imports, it produces 11.4 percent of the world's oil, pumping out 8.5 million barrels per day. Political squabbles and market uncertainty surrounding the criminal indictment of Yukos Oil, one of Russia's largest producers, rocked the market this year. Today Russia holds six percent of the world's proven oil reserves, however most of that oil is trapped in Siberia, and it is doubtful Russia's production would ever exceed that of Saudi Arabia.29 Furthermore, the instability and hostility fueled by Russia's military involvement with Chechnya, Georgia, and other lower Republics is deeply rooted in the struggle over oil pipelines to the Persian Gulf, a conflict that will continue to complicate Russia's potential as a supplier of oil.

Trumping Insecurity with America's Strong Suit: Efficiency, Innovation

The U.S. can become more secure by putting America's factories and farms to work to reduce our thirst for foreign oil. Instead of investing hundreds of billions of dollars expanding oil production in the Persian Gulf and other unstable regions, America needs to be investing in revitalizing its factories to build fuel-efficient cars and its farms to create renewable fuel supply.

Passenger vehicles are the single largest driver of United States oil consumption. But thanks to legal loopholes, the average fuel economy of America's cars and trucks has been getting worse for a decade. This pattern can be broken by providing automakers with incentives to retool their factories to produce more efficient vehicles and create new jobs, raising fuel efficiency standards, expanding the market for gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles through tax incentives, and investing in alternative fuels, such as biofuels or hydrogen.

To immediately ease our oil addiction, the US should make a national commitment to reduce our oil dependency by at least 2.5 million barrels per day within a decade and to set longer term goals that secure our energy future without depending on unstable and hostile areas of the world.

Technologies exist today to cut oil consumption while saving money. We can improve the fuel economy in cars, trucks and SUVs of all sizes and reduce oil consumed in factories and homes. America's farmers can turn crops and waste into "biofuels," displacing oil. Additional oil savings can be achieved by increasing the use of renewable, non-petroleum fuels, expanding transit options, encouraging smart growth development that makes communities more livable with less driving, increasing the efficiency of heavy trucks and aviation, expanding programs to weatherize oil-heated homes, and helping businesses adopt more efficient production processes. Over the longer run, we can replace the oil in our car and trucks with renewably produced hydrogen or biofuels.30

But it won't happen until leaders in Washington and Detroit make it happen. Instead, our energy policy leaves us too dependent on oil and the unstable regimes that supply it. We can and must reclaim our freedom and secure a cleaner, safer energy future by investing in American jobs and taking the lead on efficient technology, alternative fuels, more transportation choices, and other commonsense policies.


1. The import spending estimate is calculated based on 2003 Energy Information Administration data on U.S. crude oil imports and average annual world oil price, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/petroleu.html#IntlTrade and http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/info_glance/importexport.html.

2. The export estimate is calculated using 2004 Energy Information Administration data on U.S. crude oil imports and WTI/Cushing spot prices for January 1 to September 29, 2004. http://www.eia.gov

3. Wall Street Journal, Trade Gap Hit $54 Billion in August, Tim Annett, October 14, 2004.

4. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, October 15, 2004 and statement before the National Italian American Foundation in Washington, D.C. on Oct. 15, 2004.

5. The Center for Public Integrity. The Politics of Oil. http://www.publicintegrity.org/oil/default.aspx.

6. The Center for Public Integrity, http://www.publicintegrity.org/oil/report.aspx?aid=345.

7. Federal Reserve

8. PFC Energy. Global Crude Oil and Natural Gas Liquids Supply Forecast, September 2004.

9. International Energy Agency cited by Interfax, "Foreign Investment to Play Key Role in Development of China's Oil and Gas," China Weekly Energy Report, May 22-28, 2004.

10. Bradsher, Keith, "China Sets its First Fuel Economy Rules," New York Times, September 29, 2004.

11. The export estimate is calculated using 2004 Energy Information Administration data on U.S. crude oil imports and WTI/Cushing spot prices for January 1 to September 29, 2004. http://www.eia.gov.

12. The Economist. "The $300 Billion Bonanza", September 23, 2004.

13. The Economist. "The $300 Billion Bonanza", September 23, 2004.

14. Stone, Amey, "$50 Oil: A Spreading Slick of Pain," Business Week 9/29/04.

15. As quoted in Roberts, Paul, The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World, Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY, 2004.

16. National Defense Council Foundation. "The Hidden Cost of Imported Oil," September 2003, as cited by the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security in Energy Security Bi-Weekly, October 30, 2003, http://www.iags.org.

17. Mouawad, Jad, "Irrelevant? OPEC Is Sitting Pretty", New York Times, October 3, 2004.

18. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook, 2004.

19. The eight nations are named in Chapter Eight of the National Energy Policy, Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group, May, 2001.

20. British Petroleum, Statistical Review of World Energy 2004, http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=111&contentId=2004175.

20. Klare, p. 126.

21. EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report.

22. Giardino, Carrie, "Shell Oil Evacuates Employees from Niger Delta in Nigeria," Axcess News, 9/24; Mitchell, Andrew, "Oil price hurdles $50 on Nigeria threat," Reuters, 9/28.

24. British Petroleum, Statistical Review of World Energy 2004, http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=111&contentId=2004175.

25. EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report, http://www.eia.doe.gov/.

26. Billig, Michelle, "The Venezuelan Oil Crisis: How to Secure America's Energy," Foreign Affairs, September/October 2004.

27. Ibid.

28. The Week, Vol. 4, Issue 179, October 22, 2004.

29. EIA Russia Country Analysis Brief, September 2003 as cited in Klare, p. 122.

30. Dangerous Addiction: Ending America's Oil Dependence, Natural Resources Defense Council and Union of Concerned Scientists, 2002: http://www.nrdc.org/air/transportation/oilsecurity/securityinx.asp.

last revised 10/27/2004

All Tags [ View Popular Tags ]:
AB 1493
AB 32
air pollution
air toxics
alternative fuels
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
boreal forest
California environmental legislation
cap 2.0
cap and trade
carbon footprint
carbon offsets
carbon pollution
case studies
causes of global warming
Clean air
Clean Air Act
clean energy
clean energy economy
clean vehicles
climate change
climate legislation
clothes dryers
coal-fired power plants
compact fluorescent lighting
compact fluorescents
computer equipment
consumer products
cover crop
Danielle Droitsch
data centers
demand side management
diesel buses
diesel exhaust
dirty fuels
efficient light bulbs
efficient vehicles
electric cars
electric utilities
electric vehicles
electricity and natural gas utlities
energy efficiency
energy efficiency standard
energy efficient buildings
energy efficient light bulbs
energy effiency
energy plan
energy policy
energy security
energy-efficient bulbs
environmental history
environmental protection agency
fish & fishing
fracking risks
fuel economy
fuel efficiency
fuel efficiency standards
fuel savings
gas drilling
gas prices
global warming
global warming and the economy
global warming emissions
global warming legislation
global warming pollution
green building
green buildings
green business
green jobs
green sports
greenhouse gas emissions
gulf of mexico
halogen bulbs
halogen lightbulbs
health effects
home energy
home networks
household energy use
human health
Hurricane Katrina
hybrid cars
hybrid electric vehicles
hybrid vehicles
hydraulic fractring
hydraulic fracturing
incandescent lighbulbs
incandescent light bulbs
India Initiative
indoor air quality
infrastructure efficiency
Keystone XL
Kids' Health
Latin America
light bulbs
light emitting diodes
liquid coal
livestock farms
location efficiency
Los Angeles
Marcellus Shale
Middle East
mountaintop removal mining
natural gas
natural gas drilling
New York
nitrogen oxides
North Dakota
Northeast states
nrdc offices
nuclear energy
offshore drilling
offshore oil
oil and gas industry
oil consumption
oil dependence
oil drilling
oil imports
oil shale
oil spill
oil spills
open space
particulate pollution
Persian Gulf
power plants
public lands
public transportation
regional greenhouse gas initiative
regulatory reform
renewable energy
renewable fuel
residential small networks
respiratory illness
Rocky Mountains
SB 315
server rooms
smart biomass
smart grid
smart growth
smog air pollution
solar power
sulfur dioxide
sustainable sourcing
tar sands
tar sands pipeline
tar sands; keystone xl
tax incentives
tax subsidies
toxic waste
transportation bill
vehicle emissions
video game consoles
water efficiency
Water Pollution
what you can do
wind power
wind turbines

Sign up for NRDC's online newsletter

See the latest issue >

Give the Gift That Will Make a Difference: Renewable Reality

NRDC Gets Top Ratings from the Charity Watchdogs

Charity Navigator awards NRDC its 4-star top rating.
Worth magazine named NRDC one of America's 100 best charities.
NRDC meets the highest standards of the Wise Giving Alliance of the Better Business Bureau.

Donate now >

Related Stories

Efficient Appliances Save Energy -- and Money
A consumer's guide to buying energy efficient appliances and electronics.
Share | |
Find NRDC on