|
The streets of Manhattan are littered with flower stands -- a terrible temptation for a flower-lover like myself. On a cold winter's evening, in particular, the prospect of bringing spring cheer home in a paper wrapper is almost irresistible. I can't think of a better way to dispel the seasonal gloom.
Imagine my dismay, then, when I learned that flowers are typically grown with an arsenal of chemicals, including some that may cause neurological problems, reproductive problems, cancer and even genetic damage.
It wasn't the danger to my own health that alarmed me. My passing and very occasional contact with store-bought flowers wouldn't put me at serious risk, despite the fact that residues are actually quite substantial. (A sample of roses tested by the Environmental Working Group in 1997 found up to 50 times the residues allowed in food.) Farm workers are another story. They're exposed to the pesticides for hours every day -- and for what? I hated to think it was me.
While workers in the United States are to some extent protected by safety regulations governing pesticide use, those in Latin America -- where 70 percent of our flowers are grown -- have few safeguards. They often have to apply dangerous chemicals without proper training or handle treated flowers without protective gear. Or they may be expected to continue working in greenhouses while spraying is going on. When they go home at the end of the day in contaminated clothes, their children may be exposed. Or the children may actually work on the farms and be exposed directly. (It's estimated that some 20 percent of flower farm workers in Ecuador are kids.) Some of the chemicals used are so toxic, they're banned in the United States altogether.
The situation has recently begun to improve in some places, due, among other things, to international pressure, especially from Europe, but the change so far has been slow. Meanwhile, studies conducted in Ecuador, Colombia and Costa Rica have found symptoms in more than 50 percent of workers of chemical effects on the nervous system, such as headaches, nausea, blurred vision and fatigue. One study in Colombia found a higher level of miscarriages, premature births and congenital deformities. A study in Mexico turned up evidence that genetic damage might be taking place.
And what of the impacts on the environment? Data is scarce. However, groundwater contamination and polluted runoff are major concerns, as is overuse of water resources. One highly toxic fumigant used in floriculture, methyl bromide, is an ozone depleter.
It's enough to make you throw up your hands and vow to "buy American," but that wouldn't be a fair response. The flower industry is important to a number of Latin American economies, providing employment and, often, relatively good wages to people who might otherwise find neither. In other words, the benefits are as real as the risks.
Anyway, it's not as if our own flower industry has forsworn chemicals. Domestic flowers are grown with tons of the stuff, which gets into our air, water and soil and is absorbed and ingested by wildlife. Worker safety might be better here than in Latin America, but is not good enough.
As with food, the way around the problem is to buy flowers grown organically. While organic varieties still make up a small portion of the flower market, they are available -- both from Latin American and domestic sources -- online, if not at your local store.
To complicate matters, I feel I have to mention the cost -- in energy use and pollution -- of flying in flowers from faraway places, whether Latin America or the other side of the United States. Obviously, locally grown organic flowers would be a much better choice. However, these may not be an option for winter birthdays or Valentine's Day if you live up north.
I say, fly the things in for the special occasions. But if you want flowers year-round just to brighten your home, try drying the ones you get in the warmer months. The colors may not be as vivid, but they're awfully cheery all the same.
Sheryl Eisenberg
|