Environmental Issues > Oceans Main Page > All Documents in Oceans > Testing the Waters

Ranked 6th in Beachwater Quality (out of 30 states)
4% of samples exceeded national standards for designated beach areas in 2011

In order to protect beach goers from waterborne illnesses, we need strong policies to identify unsafe beach water quality and to clean up the major sources of beach pollution. EPA is revising the safety standards that are designed to protect swimmers from getting sick, but the agency needs to strengthen its proposed standards, which—based on EPA’s estimates of illness risks—would make it acceptable for 1 in 28 swimmers to become ill. In addition, because polluted runoff is the biggest known source of pollution that causes swimming advisories or beach closings, EPA needs to reform the national requirements that govern sources of polluted stormwater, and the states and EPA need to rigorously enforce existing requirements to ensure that runoff is controlled using innovative solutions known as green infrastructure that enable communities to naturally absorb or use runoff before it causes problems.

Key Findings in Virginia

Reported Sources of Beachwater Contamination
(number of closing/advisory days)

  • 69 (100%) unknown contamination sources
  • Rated
  • Monitoring data available
  • No monitoring data available
Please enable Javascript in your browser to see the interactive map.

Beta version: Beach location information is based on the best-available EPA datasets (learn about our beach location methodology). Please feel free to suggest a correction or provide feedback.

Click on icons to view

Virginia has 49 public beaches stretching along 70 miles of Atlantic and Chesapeake Bay waters. The state's beachwater quality monitoring program is administered by the Virginia Department of Health (VDH).

What Does Beachwater Monitoring Show?

In 2011, Virginia reported 48 coastal beaches. Of these, 46 (96%) were assigned a monitoring frequency of once a week, and 2 (4%) were not assigned a monitoring frequency. An additional beach, Assateague Island National Seashore, is monitored once a week by the state of Maryland (this beach straddles Accomack County in Virginia and Worcester County in Maryland; the monitored location is in Virginia). Results for Assateague Island National Seashore are included in this analysis for the state of Virginia. In 2011, 4% of all reported beach monitoring samples exceeded the state's daily maximum bacterial standard of 104 colonies/100 ml. The beaches with the highest percent exceedance rates of the state standard in 2011 were Fairview Beach in King George County (33%) and Hilton Beach (30%), Huntington Beach (25%), and Anderson's Beach (20%) in the independent city of Newport News. Beaches in King George County had the highest exceedance rate of the state standard in 2011 (33%), followed by beaches in the independent cities of Newport News (22%), Norfolk (4%), Hampton (2%), and Virginia Beach (1%). There were no exceedances in Accomack, Gloucester, Mathews, Northampton, and York counties. NRDC considers all reported samples individually (without averaging) when calculating the percent exceedance rates in this analysis. This includes duplicate samples and samples taken outside the official beach season, if any.

* Please note that only samples from a common set of beaches monitored each year from 2007-2011 are included in the bar chart.

What Are Virginia's Sampling Practices?

The monitoring season runs from mid-May through Labor Day, with some sites sampled through mid-September. VDH determines sampling practices, locations, standards, and notification protocols and practices throughout the state. Samples are collected in water 0.5 meters deep, 0.3 meters from the surface.1

Priority for monitoring is given to sampling sites that are in close proximity to wastewater outfalls, that have high bather load, and where there is easy access to the beach.2 If a beach is placed under advisory or closed, the water is resampled immediately (with a duplicate sample sent for microbial source tracking analysis) and the monitoring frequency is increased until the water meets water quality standards and the beach is reopened.2 States that monitor more frequently after an exceedance is found will tend to have higher percent exceedance rates and lower total closing/advisory days than they would if their sampling frequency did not increase after an exceedance was found.

The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and VDH, including the Virginia Division of Shellfish Sanitation, work together to regularly monitor the water, including shellfish-growing areas, for the presence of harmful algal blooms and to conduct surveillance for human health effects.3

How Many Beach Closings or Advisories Were Issued in 2011?

Total closing/advisory days for 28 events lasting six consecutive weeks or less decreased 15% to 69 days in 2011 from 81 days in 2010. For prior years, there were 51 days in 2009, 29 days in 2008, 50 days in 2007, 43 days in 2006, and 42 days in 2005. In addition, there were no extended or permanent events in 2011. Extended events are those in effect more than six weeks but not more than 13 consecutive weeks; permanent events are in effect for more than 13 consecutive weeks. All closing and advisory days in 2011 were due to monitoring that revealed elevated bacteria levels.

How Does Virginia Determine When to Warn Visitors About Swimming?

The VDH has the authority to issue advisories and close beaches. Virginia's water quality standard is a single-sample maximum of 104 cfu/100 ml. No geometric mean standard is applied when making closing and advisory decisions. If more than one sampling site at a beach exists, the average of the results for all sampling sites is used to make closing and advisory decisions for that beach.2 If a sample (or average of samples) exceeds the standard, an advisory is issued.2 There is no protocol for delaying or forgoing an advisory or closing when an exceedance of the single-sample maximum standard is found.

There are no preemptive rainfall standards, but closings and advisories may be considered on the basis of events such as a harmful algal blooms, fish kills, oil spills, or sewage spills.1

Virginia 2011 Monitoring Results and Notice and Advisory Days
County Beach Tier Assigned Monitoring Frequency Total Samples % of samples exceeding state standards Closing or Advisory days View

Notes

  1. Rebecca LePrell, Virginia Department of Health, personal communication, April 2012.
  2. Virginia Department of Health, Virginia Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Program, Final Report on 2001?2011 EPA Beach Monitoring Grant CU-98389607-0, February 28, 2012.
  3. Virginia Department of Health, "Harmful Algal Blooms and Other Organisms of Concern in Coastal Waters," undated brochure.

Related Factsheets

Switchboard

NRDC's staff blog

Cities and States Are Staying Afloat by Preparing for Rising Seas
posted by Ben Chou, 5/2/13
This post is part of a blog series for Getting Climate Smart, a joint effort by NRDC and American Rivers ...
Determining Delaware's Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise
posted by Ben Chou, 10/11/12
Given its relatively close proximity to the D.C. metro area, Delaware and its beaches are a popular ...
California Passes Legislation to Combat Coastal Climate Change Risks
posted by Ben Chou, 10/3/12
When you think of California, the first things that come to mind probably have to do with sunshine, ...

More from Switchboard >>

Share | |
Find NRDC on
YouTube