20210826, 22:21  #2311 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
2×5×353 Posts 
Thanks, that was my fault. I recently unified the code between the LL and PRP reports but missed those 3 columns (on both plaintext and HTML versions). Please check again, let me know if it's not looking as expected now.

20210827, 09:56  #2312 
Jul 2004
Milan, Ita
2^{2}·47 Posts 

20210827, 14:39  #2313 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
2·5·353 Posts 

20210827, 20:44  #2314 
Jul 2004
Milan, Ita
BC_{16} Posts 

20210828, 07:35  #2315 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
11011011001_{2} Posts 
Thanks for adding the "Jump to" links. It facilitates the navigation when there are a lot of results. A last one at the end of the list would make it perfect.
Then at the moment it is possible to sort only the first category, it would be nice to be able to sort the others as well in those reports. (For instance if there are Verified and Unverified tests, only the first category can be sorted.) 
20210828, 10:45  #2316 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
DCA_{16} Posts 

20210828, 11:18  #2317 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
3331_{8} Posts 

20210902, 07:17  #2318 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
1,753 Posts 
Exponent Status Distribution : some ranges don't add up
Some ranges in the Work Distribution Map have more exponents when counted by their status (Prime, Factored, Checked, One LL, Error, no tests) than the total number of prime exponents in the range. It might be a consequence of the introduction of PRP tests.
When looking at the "PrimeNet Activity Summary 20210902 05:00 UTC" the following ranges don't add up. (Those ranges don't have any "Error" or "No LL" exponents.) Code:
Range Exp. Prime Fact'd Checked OneLL Extra 1000000 70435 2 53030 17407 4 3000000 66330 1 46893 19437 1 4000000 65367 45425 19943 1 6000000 63799 1 43388 20411 1 7000000 63129 42632 20498 1 10000000 61938 41350 20591 3 83000000 54822 35483 1207 18133 1 101000000 54316 35141 14730 4446 1 
20210902, 07:51  #2319 
"Jacob"
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
1,753 Posts 
Work distribution map : missing or extra available exponents in some ranges
Some ranges in the Work Distribution Map have missing or too many exponents, in most cases this situation is ongoing for some months.
For exponents below 40M the ranges 15M and 21M have more available for TF than there are unfactored ; 1M, 3M, 4M, 6M, 7M, 10M, 23M, 30M have less. 899M has 1 more exponent available for factoring or testing than there are unfactored. 60M, 61M, 63M, 103M, 104M, 105M, 106M, 107M, 108M, 109M, 110M, 111M, 112M, 113M, 122M, 126M, 132M, 150M, 161M, 164M, 165M, 166M, 184M, 332M, 333M, 371M, 843M have missing exponents : the number of exponents being worked on, plus those available is less than the number of those not yet factored or (probably) proven composite. 
20210904, 13:56  #2320 
Aug 2020
97 Posts 
Primenet CPU Speed Reporting
It appears that the Primenet CPU Speed Calculation Favors Intel processors over AMD processors. Please see the attached pictures of a Ryzen 5 5600G vs a I39100. The only reason I bring this up is that the Ryzen 5 5600G seems to be stuck doing double check work because it is calculated to be too slow to get first time work per the Primenet thresholds (see attached picture). I can confirm that the 5600G is twice as fast as the I39100.

20210904, 17:43  #2321 
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
1110111111101_{2} Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Official "Faits erronĂ©s dans de belleslettres" thread  ewmayer  Lounge  39  20150519 01:08 
Official "allGreektome Fiction Literature and Cinema" Thread  ewmayer  Science & Technology  41  20140416 11:54 
Official "Lasciate ogne speranza" whingethread  cheesehead  Soap Box  56  20130629 01:42 
Official "Ernst is a deceiving bully and George is a meanie" thread  cheesehead  Soap Box  61  20130611 04:30 
Official "String copy Statement Considered Harmful" thread  Dubslow  Programming  19  20120531 17:49 