G20 in Japan: Time for PM Abe to End Support for Coal Plants

Over 23,000 hospitalizations, outdoor pools too hot for swimming, construction workers wearing battery-powered fans to avoid heatstroke, and the deaths of 1,032 people—these were the direct consequences of the July 2018 heatwave in Japan, when temperatures reached 106 degrees Fahrenheit (41.1 degrees Celsius). New scientific research from the Meteorological Society of Japan provides clear evidence that the July 2018 heatwave “event would never have happened without anthropogenic global warming.” The consequences of climate change, in Japan and around the world, are clear, present and dangerous. At this year’s G20, the Abe government has a choice to make: take meaningful action on climate change by ending taxpayer support for domestic and overseas coal plants, or continue to fund the energy source most responsible for climate change.

If Prime Minister Abe were to reverse course on Japan’s public financing, promotion and export of outdated coal technology, he would be joining leaders from Canada, UK, France and Germany who have committed to phaseout dates for all domestic coal plants, and restrictions on financing overseas coal plants. If instead Prime Minister Abe continues using Japan’s taxpayer money to subsidize inefficient Japanese coal equipment manufacturers, then he risks being branded a hypocrite who writes platitudes in the Financial Times about Japan’s climate commitments, while financing dirty coal plants all over the world.

Japan’s domestic coal plant oversupply

Even though Japan’s environment minister has announced opposition to new coal plants, the Abe government and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) continue to pursue a costly agenda that brings dirtier air to Japan and undermines the Paris Climate Agreement. Many new-coal fired power plants are planned or under construction in Japan, despite lawsuits from citizens about the health and climate impacts. According to Kiko Network in Japan, 50 new coal-fired power units have been proposed since 2012. So far, 13 of them have been canceled while 12 were built, and 25 remain in the pipeline.

Instead of building new coal plants, Japan should be retiring coal plants and phasing out of thermal coal by 2030 along with the rest of the OECD. Many of the coal plants already cancelled thus far are because the coal plants cannot offer sufficient profitability, due to increasing competition from lower-cost renewables, as well as vastly overestimated electricity demand. As renewable energy deployment rises in Japan and energy efficiency improvements are made, coal plants could be running at less than 50% capacity compared to the projected 70% capacity required for profitability.

According to research from Oxford University, the competition from other technologies like nuclear and renewables which have lower marginal costs means that there is likely to be “significant asset stranding of coal generation assets” in Japan. The cost of stranded assets could be between $61 billion and $80 billion–about 23-29% of the current market capitalization of Japan’s power utilities, or about 4.5% to 6% of their total assets. Tokyo Electric Power Co. has the highest exposure to asset stranding, while J-Power has the highest risk of asset stranding relative to total assets, at over 20 percent. Ultimately, the risky bets on coal fall on the public, either through higher prices for power consumers or costly subsidies to the companies. A feasible and science-based coal phaseout timeline for Japan already exists, but it’s up to the Abe government to take the lead on this initiative.

Japan private finance for coal

Japanese government subsidization of the capital costs and de-risking of coal plant construction overseas encourages Japan’s private banks to get in on the action, even though these projects are likely to become stranded assets. Japan’s big banks such as MUFG, Mizuho and SMBC are among the biggest lenders to global coal developers, diverting billions on coal plants instead of on clean energy sources. While the banks have created policies on lending for coal plants, gaping loopholes in the policies for MUFG, Mizuho and SMBC still allow construction of new, only marginally less polluting coal projects.

Japan’s public finance for coal overseas

Japanese companies are building more coal plants overseas as the option of building such plants domestically declines. Based on NRDC’s tracking of international public financing for coal plants, in the five years from 2013 to 2018, the Japanese government has provided $15 billion in financing for coal plants and mines, through loans or guarantees. This financing is provided by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI). Groups from Vietnam, Japan and around the world have asked for the Japanese government to stop funding these projects, such as the highly controversial Van Phong I project in Vietnam, which is opposed by civil society groups in Vietnam, Japan and globally.

Japan’s financing for dirty coal plants extends to Indonesia, Vietnam, Bangladesh, India and as far away as Morocco and Chile. The government intends to support construction of even more coal plants in Mongolia, Vietnam and Indonesia, despite the negative impact the coal plants will have on air quality and public health in these countries.

Coal Projects Funded by the Japanese Government Overseas

According to the latest study by Greenpeace, Japanese over-investment in coal-fired power plants in Indonesia will increase an overcapacity problem on the Java-Bali power grid, where more coal plants will worsen the current financial situation for the state-owned utility company PLN.

Coal plants built by Japan overseas have such low air quality standards, most of these projects would never receive permission to be built in Japan. (From NRDC “Power Shift” Report)

As the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) recently reported, global costs for renewables continue to fall. The cost of coal is always volatile due to the fuel supply and foreign currency volatility, and costs will inevitably rise as the true prices of externalities are added into projects. In short, the Japanese government is putting utilities and energy consumers in many developing countries on the hook for unnecessarily high electricity prices, and leaving them with a huge risk of “stranded assets”—massive long-term debts that will cost developing economies millions just in the interest payments alone for plants that are more expensive to operate than alternatives.

Cleaner Energy Options

If the Japanese government were serious about climate change, then the $15 billion wasted on coal finance overseas from 2013-2018 could have been better spent funding renewable energy projects. That same funding could have supported 10 GW of onshore wind projects overseas or 12 GW of solar projects (based on average 2018 global costs), powering millions of homes with clean electricity and helping countries adopt truly sustainable growth pathways for energy use.

Unfortunately, Japan is not remaining globally competitive in renewables, but subsidizing failing businesses in the coal sector. IHS Markit and Energy Futures Initiatives reported that in 2017 China invested $100 billion in renewables, the US invested $40 billion, while Japan only invested $20 billion.

Recommendations

The G20 hosted by Japan is an opportunity for Prime Minister Abe to announce that Japan will initiate a phaseout plan for coal with a 2030 deadline, and to announce that Japan will stop using developing nations as a dumping ground for outdated coal technologies, subsidized by Japanese public funds. Prime Minister Abe can direct government financial institutions like JBIC and JICA to end all financing for coal plants overseas as well as thermal coal mining. Abe can also direct JBIC and JICA to establish targets and incentives for financing more renewables overseas, paving the way through learning-by-doing, so that private capital is mobilized to leverage this investment many-fold. If Japan can do that, then it will demonstrate that it is serious about becoming a global leader taking effective action on climate change.

About the Authors

Han Chen

Manager, Energy Policy, International Program
Blog Post

The findings from the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on 1.5 and UNEP Emissions Gap report made clear that global emissions must be decreased starting immediately. Attempts to build new fossil-fuel fired power plants contradicts the aims of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals.

Blog Post

Japan ranks very poorly because of its continued subsidies for fossil fuel exploration and production, and because it provides billions in taxpayer dollars for building highly polluting coal plants in some of the most climate-vulnerable countries overseas.

Blog Post

Major Japanese life insurance companies are finally starting to recognize that investments in new coal-fired power generation projects are both financially and environmentally irresponsible.

Blog Post

Continued government financing for international coal projects undermines the Paris Agreement and the prospects of a low-carbon future. To address climate change, governments must shift international public finance toward smarter, sustainable options such as solar and wind power.

Blog Post

In US Energy Secretary Rick Perry’s opening address at the CERAweek conference, he tried to garner interest for a global pro-fossil fuel alliance. This misguided initiative, supported wholeheartedly by Japan’s Prime Minister Abe, is yet another way Perry is trying to bail out the coal companies.

Join Us

When you sign up you'll become a member of NRDC's Activist Network. We will keep you informed with the latest alerts and progress reports.