What We're Doing

Policy Solution

As polluters are far more likely to target low-income communities, we empower residents to create the healthier neighborhoods they deserve.

Policy Solution

With the tar sands invasion comes serious health risks. We bring these issues to the forefront and fight to protect communities from this dirty oil.

Policy Solution

We help slash the toxic, cancer-causing pollution from America’s busy ports, rail yards, and truck routes.

Policy Solution

As a leading authority on the Clean Air Act for more than four decades, we take polluters to court and use this law to limit dangerous air pollution.

Policy Solution

Air pollution at fracking sites can cause childhood leukemia, cardiac problems, and birth defects. We fight to protect people from the potential health risks of unchecked fracking.

Policy Solution

Not everyone realizes that the events fueled by climate change are causing health problems, so we connect the dots and encourage governments to take action.

Related Priorities

What You Can Do

Protect your community from big polluters using our step-by-step guide

A step-by-step guide to protecting your community from dirty development projects.

How to tackle fracking in your community

How to protect your community from crude oil "bomb trains"

Tell your senators: Clean Flint's water!

How to call Congress

Ways to make change globally by acting locally

Keep the KXL tar sands pipeline out of Nebraska

Urge your governor to lead on climate action

Tell Trump we won't stop fighting global climate change

Experts & Resources

CA Bills Aim to Relieve Doubt and Keep Good Food from Trash
Andrea Spacht

Once again, California is leading the charge on sustainability solutions. Sitting on the Governor’s desk are two bills that will help cut through confusion and encourage getting good food into people’s bellies instead of tossed into the trash. 

In the U.S., up to 40 percent of our food goes uneaten. Food loss and waste occurs at every stage of the supply chain.  And by the time our food gets to our table a lot of resources have gone into it including water, fertilizer, and land to grow it; labor to pick, transport and prepare it; energy to move and keep it at the right temperature. All in all, our wasted food has an annual cost estimated at $218 billion. Even in California, where we have some of the most progressive recycling targets and significant compost collection infrastructure, about 5.6 million tons of food is sent to landfills every year. 

AB 1219, the California Good Samaritan Food Donation Act authored by Assembly Member Susan Talamantes Eggman strengthens and expands liability protections for food donors to further encourage donation of surplus food to hungry people. Both the Federal Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act and a 1977 California law protect individuals, businesses, and government entities that donate food to nonprofit food recovery organizations. Despite these protections, a lot of wholesome surplus food goes to waste. 

Last year, NRDC and Harvard Food Law and Policy Clinic outlined recommendations for how the Emerson Act could be improved. AB 1219 codifies two of those recommendations in California: donations to individuals and donation of past-date food. Currently, only food donations to nonprofit charitable organizations or a food bank are protected from legal liability. The bill expands protections to include donations directly given to end recipients. So long as the entity giving out the food makes a good faith evaluation that the food is wholesome, the donation will now be protected. 

Another important component of the California bill is that it explicitly extends protections to the donation of food that is fit for human consumption even if it has exceeded the labeled shelf life date recommended by the manufacturer. U.S. consumers and businesses needlessly trash billions of pounds of food due to confusion over how to interpret the various date labels printed on food. However, almost none of those dates indicate the safety of food.  In fact, the dates are generally suggestions by manufacturers for when food is at its peak quality, not when it is unsafe to eat. So long as it remains wholesome, surplus food should be donated to feed people, not buried in a landfill.

Image of egg carton with Sell by date label

Photo: Andrea Spacht

Speaking of those food dates, AB 954, authored by Assembly Member David Chiu, aims to cut through the confusion and streamline food date labels by encouraging the voluntary use of one term to indicate the quality of a product and one phrase to indicate the safety of a product rather than the myriad date descriptors that are used now. The bill requires the California Department of Food and Agriculture to publish information and encourage food manufacturers to use uniform terms on food product labels. “BEST if Used by” or “BEST if Used or Frozen by” would indicate the date by which best quality can be expected whereas “USE by” or “USE by or Freeze by” would indicate the date through which food should be consumed or frozen because the product has increased safety concerns with time. Furthermore, if the bill is signed, the department would encourage food distributors and retailers to stop using “sell by” date labels or to hide them from consumers (these dates are really meant for grocers and are typically earlier, but consumers mistake them to mean the product is bad).  Additionally, the bill includes a consumer education component to help us all understand how these labels are being used.

In December 2016, USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service released new guidance recommending that manufacturers and retailers use “Best if used by” as the universal terminology to indicate quality.  And comprehensive food waste bills, including the same standards for date labeling on food, have been introduced federally. Last week, a coalition of global food companies issued a call to action asking food producers and retailers to simplify date labels and to partner with government agencies to educate consumers. 

The time is ripe for meaningful action to cut food waste. In signing these bills, Governor Brown will set California further ahead on the path to achieving a more efficient and secure food system.  Perhaps the Feds will follow suit?

AB 1219 is cosponsored by Californians Against Waste and the California Association of Food Banks.  AB 954 is sponsored by Californians Against Waste.

Blog Post

California legislative wrap-up

Blog Post

Comprehensive federal legislation to reduce wasted food has just been introduced in both the House and Senate.

Lead in Newark’s Drinking Water

Background on Lead in Drinking Water

Lead is a heavy metal that can find its way into drinking water when it dissolves or comes off in flakes from lead pipes and plumbing fixtures, especially when the water is corrosive (can erode or damage pipes). Children and pregnant women are most at risk from lead exposure.

Exposure to low levels of lead can cause serious, irreversible damage to children’s developing brains and nervous systems. Exposure to lead can also cause miscarriages and stillbirths in pregnant women, as well as fertility issues, cardiovascular and kidney effects, cognitive dysfunction, and elevated blood pressure in adults.

Federal Rules for Lead in Drinking Water

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Lead and Copper Rule regulates the presence of lead in drinking water. Under the rule, if more than 10 percent of samples test above 15 parts per billion, the federal lead “action level” is exceeded. An “action level” exceedance triggers mandatory requirements that a water system must perform. For Newark, these requirements include water quality monitoring, corrosion control treatment, source water monitoring and treatment, public education, and lead service line replacement. Newark must treat its water to guard against corrosion (pipe erosion and damage) to minimize lead “leaching” (when lead is dissolved from pipes or fixtures and transfers into the water) or flaking of small lead particles from pipes or fixtures into tap water.

Newark’s Excessive Lead Levels in its Tap Water

The Newark Water Department recently exceeded the federal “action level” for lead. New Jersey’s Drinking Water Watch database shows that Newark’s lead levels almost tripled compared to previous measurements, rising to 27 parts per billion at the 90th percentile. That is nearly twice the federal action level for lead of 15 parts per billion. The city reportedly collected 129 total water samples in first half of 2017.

Newark also had 5 addresses testing in excess of 50 parts per billion (more than 3 times the federal standard) in 2017. Testing was as high as 137 parts per billion (over 9 times the federal standard) at one Newark address. To date, despite formal open records requests, Newark and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection have not disclosed a comprehensive list of the addresses of homes or other locations tested.

The Newark Water Department serves a residential population of around 273,000 people. Documents provided by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection indicate that not all of the 129 samples that were collected from Newark homes were taken from “Tier 1” sample sites, served by a lead service line, lead pipe, or copper pipe with lead solder.  Under federal rules, all of the locations counted for compliance purposes are supposed to be Tier 1 sites if available -- those at highest risk of lead contamination.

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection sent a letter on July 11, 2017 to the Newark Water Department that we have obtained under an Open Public Records Act request. Among other things, the NJDEP found that Newark “is out of compliance” with the rules for lead in drinking water. Newark’s water system, the letter explains, exceeds the EPA Action Level for lead, and it is “deemed to no longer have optimized corrosion control treatment” as required to minimize lead contamination.

Actions Required of Newark’s Water Department

According to the July 11, 2017 letter provided by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, the Newark Water Department has been instructed, and is required by federal law, to undertake the following actions in response to the lead contamination issue:

  • Conduct extensive public education about its recent lead action level exceedance by August 30, 2017, in accordance with federal regulations (40 CFR 141.85(b)(4))
  • Commence replacing lead service lines immediately as required by federal regulations (40 CFR 141.84)
  • Submit a list of all lead service lines in the water system and the replacement schedule to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Bureau of Water System Engineering by September 10, 2017
  • Conduct source water monitoring for lead and copper in accordance with federal regulations (40 CFR 141.88 et. seq.)
  • Provide a source water treatment recommendation based on source water monitoring results to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Bureau of Water System Engineering by December 31, 2017 (40 CFR 141.83(a); 40 CFR 141.83(b))
  • Conduct water quality parameter monitoring in accordance with federal regulations (40 CFR 141.87 et. seq.)
  • Submit a revised Lead and Copper Sampling Plan that complies with federal requirements to the Bureau of Water System Engineering by August 11, 2017 (40 CFR 141.86)
  • Submit an optimal corrosion control treatment recommendation and supporting documents to the Bureau of Water System Engineering by December 31, 2017, that comports with federal regulations (40 CFR 141.81(e); 40 CFR 141.82(a)). The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has determined that Newark has not optimized its corrosion control practices

Furthermore, the Newark Water Department was required to provide a Lead Consumer Notice to any Newark residents whose homes were tested for lead under the Lead and Copper Rule within 30 days of the Department learning of the test results.

Recommendations for Newark Residents

Until Newark restores a safe drinking water source that meets EPA standards, residents are advised to take the following steps:

  • Flush faucets by running water for a minimum of five (5) minutes prior to consumption;
  • Use only cold water from taps for drinking and cooking, as warm or hot water is more likely to contain higher levels of lead;
  • Don’t boil your drinking water—that can concentrate the lead levels;
  • Install and use water filters that are certified to remove lead by NSF International (labeled as meeting “NSF Standard 53” for lead removal—see here for a review of how to pick and operate a filter, and here for a list of filters that reduce lead levels), and regularly change the filter cartridges in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions;
  • Use only filtered or bottled water to prepare baby formula and food. Children, pregnant or nursing women should also use filtered or bottled water for drinking and cooking;
  • Get your tap water tested for lead. You can request a free test from the Newark Water Department (phone 973-733-6303), or if you’d prefer independent testing you can get it done by Healthy Babies Bright Futures, which lets you pay how much you can afford for the test (https://hbbf.org/lead-test-kits); and
  • Consider having your child tested for lead exposure by your doctor or pediatrician.

In addition, residents should consider taking the following additional steps where possible:

  • Remove and clean individual faucet aerators, as lead particles and sediment can collect in the aerator screen located at the faucets;
  • Contact a licensed plumber to replace any household plumbing that may contain lead; and
  • Flush cold water taps after installing any new household pipes or fixtures.

Who can I talk to about my concerns regarding the quality of my drinking water?

Contact the Newark Water Department, your councilmembers, and your mayor (Newark city government’s main number is (973) 733-6400). Express your concerns. Urge them to fix the problems and keep you informed about their progress. Contact your state and federal legislators (Newark’s federal officials are Rep. Donald Payne, 973-645-3213; Sen. Cory Booker, 973-639-8700, and Robert Menendez, 973-645-3030), and urge them to support a solution to Newark’s water problems and funding for water infrastructure improvement projects.


Subscribe to RSS - Protecting Communities