National news coverage of the Flint water crisis dwindled not long after the March 2017 settlement of the federal lawsuit brought by NRDC, Concerned Pastors for Social Action, Flint resident Melissa Mays, and the ACLU of Michigan. But it has remained top-of-mind for the NRDC lawyers, who are working to make sure the city of Flint and Michigan state officials uphold their legal obligation to find and fund the replacement of Flint’s lead and galvanized steel pipes.
“People think once you win a case, it’s over,” says Margie Kelly, a strategic communications manager based in NRDC’s Chicago office. “But that’s not the situation in Flint, where we have been fighting to make sure the lead lines really do come out of the ground—in a way that’s accountable to the people there. It really goes to show the tenacity of our lawyers.”
Senior attorney Dimple Chaudhary, who was lead counsel on the case, knew from the start that the $97 million replacement program would require steady oversight, especially given Flint’s lack of resources. “We’ve worked to make sure we could track what the city is doing, what the state is doing—and what they aren't doing,” she says.
Dissatisfied with the progress on the ground, NRDC went back to court in 2018 to press the city to improve its techniques for finding lead service lines. By February 2019, its officials agreed to begin using a data-driven approach to the work and to produce monthly reports on their results. Meanwhile, in the subsequent months, Chaudhary and her colleagues, along with local community groups, launched a public outreach campaign aiming to ensure that every resident knew their rights to have their pipes replaced before the end of the city’s pipe replacement program.
The shift worked: So far, the city of Flint reports that it has investigated more than 24,000 of its 28,000 lines and replaced about 9,000 of them. And that’s a number that a dedicated group of community coordinators are helping to boost.
Brandon Smith and Samiyyah El-Amin are outreach contractors who have worked with NRDC to contact residents who either declined or didn’t respond to the offer to have their water pipes replaced. On top of their full-time jobs as outreach workers for the Flint-based Genesee Health System, the pair have been going door to door across the city explaining the benefits of new pipes, answering questions, and seeking residents’ permission for replacement.
“Most people have been very receptive to us, especially with us being from Flint,” Smith says, noting that the most common reason people decline replacement is because they don’t want their yards torn up. But residents express concerns that go well beyond their lawns, too. “There’s a lot of mistrust out here because of people with higher power saying the water was okay,” Smith says. “So people also really like being able to vent to us. We don’t rush them and we listen to their problems.”
The work is rewarding, El-Amin notes. “They appreciate the fact that we’re actually coming out and knocking on their doors and making sure that things are getting done,” she says. She adds that there is some crossover with their day jobs at Genesee, where they are part of a program created in the wake of the water crisis to check in on people and provide information on resources related to mental health and other care.
The progress of the pipe replacement program has been exciting, Chaudhary says, but agrees that “there's so much more that needs to be done in Flint to make the city whole.” Among other problems, this includes medical conditions and property damage that resulted from the water crisis. “There’s a concern that Flint will be forgotten—and then, who will do that work?” she asks. While addressing some issues of concern for residents may be outside of NRDC’s areas of expertise, Chaudhary says, maintaining relationships in the community—including with Smith and El-Amin—will ensure that NRDC can stay engaged as the recovery continues.
The ongoing work in Flint has been an important model for NRDC’s involvement in other cities grappling with lead in their drinking water. In Newark, New Jersey, where lead contamination also remains a serious problem, and where NRDC and the Newark Education Workers Caucus filed a lawsuit in 2018, the push to demand accountability from officials continues. While Newark has shifted its stance from denial to grudging acknowledgment of the issue, it is still not providing filters or critical instruction on the proper installation, use, and maintenance of filters to all affected residents.
“When my family and I first heard about the recent lead problems in our drinking water, we were terrified,” Felicia Alston-Singleton, a public housing resident in Newark’s West Ward, and an NRDC member, said in a court declaration. “I’ve had a really hard time getting any information about my own home’s water. I worry that the city will only tell my landlord if there is a problem and that no one will tell me. I’m terrified that we’re all being exposed and don’t know it.”
Advocates have heard stories like Alston-Singleton’s all too often. A September 2019 report called Watered Down Justice that NRDC coauthored with the Environmental Justice Health Alliance for Chemical Policy Reform and Coming Clean found that ongoing water contamination in majority-Black cities like Flint and Newark could be related to a history of community disinvestment, residential segregation, and discrimination. The research team analyzed EPA data from 2016 to 2019. They noted that drinking water systems in violation of the law for the entire study period were 40 percent more likely to be in places with higher percentages of populations that were people of color. And even when actions were taken to compel repairs, it took longer for water systems in places with more communities of color to come back into compliance.
“One of the hardest takeaways from this work is that people can have brand-new pipes and still never trust that the water is safe,” Chaudhary says. “That’s the damage and the lasting lesson of Flint. In Newark, we have to get this right—and quickly. It’s not just about fixing the water. It’s also about restoring people’s faith that the government is looking out for them.”
NRDC.org stories are available for online republication by news media outlets or nonprofits under these conditions: The writer(s) must be credited with a byline; you must note prominently that the story was originally published by NRDC.org and link to the original; the story cannot be edited (beyond simple things such as time and place elements, style, and grammar); you can’t resell the story in any form or grant republishing rights to other outlets; you can’t republish our material wholesale or automatically—you need to select stories individually; you can't republish the photos or graphics on our site without specific permission; you should drop us a note to let us know when you’ve used one of our stories.
In the midst of a pandemic, NRDC advocates are stepping up their work to prevent the risk of mass utility shutoffs, now and for the long-term.
Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha is helping to bring attention to the high lead levels in Newark, New Jersey’s drinking water—some of the highest recently recorded by a large water system in the United States.
These four NRDC lawyers would finish each other’s thoughts—at any odd hour of the day or night—in their quest to help victims of the city’s lead crisis.
Denials and delays from city officials have failed to keep residents safe from high levels of lead in their drinking water. These community organizers are busy picking up the slack.
Officials may have finally acknowledged the drinking water crisis in this New Jersey city, but that hasn’t stopped them from misleading residents. Here are the facts.
After officials repeatedly dismissed claims that Flint’s water was making people sick, residents took action. Here’s how the lead contamination crisis unfolded—and what we can learn from it.