Data, Reports & Resources

NRDC is a leader and trusted source in environmental policy and research. 

From reports to issue briefs, we ensure accountability through peer review led by our Science Office, which provides data and scientific analysis that help shape and guide NRDC’s policies and positions. We also offer a range of other resources, such as 101 guides and consumer-focused scorecards to increase access to knowledge about how everyone can be a catalyst for change. 

Skip carousel items
A pipe sits atop dirt next to a building

Will Funds for Water Infrastructure Flow Fairly?

ReportUnited StatesBecky Hammer, Erik D. Olson
These report cards grade all 50 states on water funding equity.
A view of the cross-section of a cut water pipe

Getting the Lead Out: Removing Lead Pipes Would Yield Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in Health Benefits

Issue BriefUnited StatesErik D. Olson
Removing lead service lines could save the United States an estimated $786 billion from avoided health impacts over the next 35 years.
Bits of plastic waste float underwater

The Worst of the Worst: High-Priority Plastic Materials, Chemical Additives, and Products to Phase Out

Fact SheetUnited States, InternationalDr. Veena Singla

Viewing 161 - 180 of 297

Active filters:

Remove all filters

Filter Results

NRDC Comments on CPP Federal and Model Plans (PDF)

Comments
Comments of the Natural Resources Defense Council on EPA’s proposed federal plan requirements and model trading rules for the Clean Power Plan rule to limit power plant carbon pollution. Submitted January 21, 2016.

NRDC Support Letter for NTP Neonic Review (PDF)

Comments
Comments from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Supporting the NIEHS Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Review of Neonicotinoid Pesticides. (80 FR 60692; October 7, 2015)

Comments to California OEHHA on PFOA-PFOS (PDF)

Comments
Comments submitted to the Developmental and Reproductive Toxicants Identification Committee of California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, recommending that perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) be prioritized for the further development of hazard identification materials.