EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt called the Superfund program “absolutely essential,” and in an agency-wide memo, declared that these cleanup efforts “will be restored to their rightful place at the center of the agency’s core mission.” The EPA chief is even insisting that he must personally be involved in decisions affecting any cleanup with estimated costs of $50 million or more. (The 142 largest Superfund sites would cost about $140 million each.) This is good news, given that one in four Americans lives within three miles of a hazardous waste site, and more than 1,300 Superfund sites appear on the EPA’s National Priorities List. President Trump, however, apparently missed Pruitt’s memo, because the administration’s proposed budget would slash Superfund spending by a third—about $330 million—annually, beginning next year.
Skip carousel items
Fact SheetUnited States
A short brief on the activities of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency which serve to protect the environment and our public's health.
ExplainerPuerto Rico, New York City, United States, ClevelandBrian Palmer
Let’s not forget what America looked like before we had the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Our rivers caught on fire, our air was full of smog, and it stank (literally).
Press Release
WASHINGTON – The Trump Administration today signaled its plan to drastically slash the Environmental Protection Agency's budget―by as much as 24 percent, according to the press.
Press Release
WASHINGTON – President Trump released his proposed 2018 federal budget today, and experts at the Natural Resources Defense Council made these comments on budgets for the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Interior, Department of Energy and the National Oceanic and…