Attacks on the Endangered Species Act Are Coming in Fast

The Trump administration and anti-environment members of Congress are intent on waging a war on the law—and all the wildlife that depend on it. 

The Endangered Species Act is our most effective and important tool for combating the alarming decline of wildlife across the United States. But despite a million species at risk of extinction in coming decades and strong public support for the Endangered Species Act, the Trump administration and anti-environment legislators are intent again on gutting the law to line the pockets of dirty industry. Many efforts are straight out of Chapter 16 of the Project 2025 playbook.  

In Congress, these attacks are coming fast. Already, we’ve seen several pieces of anti-wildlife legislation introduced that target individual species and block essential Endangered Species Act protections. And several of these bills have already been heard in their respective committees, clearing the first benchmark to becoming law and demonstrating that legislators in the majority are serious about advancing them. 

The broadest assault on the Endangered Species Act coming out of Congress is the ESA Amendments Act of 2025, H.R. 1897. Under the guise of increasing collaboration and transparency, the bill would gut core protections for our nation’s most imperiled species. The bill makes dozens of harmful changes, but these are some of the most egregious: 

Section 101 delays species protections for years. More species in need of Endangered Species Act listing will languish without protections, making it even harder to save and recover those species if they are eventually listed. This section would also make it harder for the public to challenge delayed protections in court.

Section 203 and others make it easier for destructive projects to move forward without considering their impacts on listed species. Permits explicitly allowing harm to listed species would not be reviewed at all—meaning they could inadvertently push species to extinction.

Section 301 hands over management of threatened species to states that often lack the resources, expertise, and political will to protect these species. In certain states, the state management has been notoriously inadequate for species like the gray wolf, sage grouse, and others.

Section 304 repeals strong, automatic protections for threatened species in favor of special rules that often favor industry. It will also force already under-resourced agencies—now further gutted under the Trump administration—to issue far more rules to provide basic protections for these species.

Section 504 would eliminate protections for critical habitat, areas that have been deemed crucial to the survival and recovery of listed species. 

Another congressional attack is the Fix Our Forests Act, H.R. 471/S. 1462, a bill with versions in both chambers of Congress that purports to address wildfire risk and forest health but instead would fast-track large-scale logging projects at the expense of species and ecosystems. The sections of this bill that pose significant threats to the Endangered Species Act:  

Section 121 limits the ability of the public to challenge forest management activities in court. This will only serve to make it more difficult for those impacted by destructive projects to ensure that legal protections are upheld.

Section 122 (the so-called cottonwood fix) exempts long-term management plans prepared by the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management from the requirement to reassess the plans based on new information. If a new species is listed under the Endangered Species Act or a habitat is newly protected within the area governed by the plan, these agencies will not have to revisit the plan to ensure that it adequately protects the species or habitat. Inadequately protective plans could therefore be in place for years—if not decades—contributing to the decline of already imperiled species. 

Members of Congress also frequently seek to overturn protections for specific species, prioritizing politics over the science-based determinations of expert agencies charged with administering the Endangered Species Act. One of the latest examples is Representative Lauren Boebert’s Pet and Livestock Protection Act, H.R. 845, which would reinstate a rule delisting the gray wolf. A court struck down the rule as unlawful in 2022, but H.R. 845 would prohibit judicial review of its reinstatement. 

As one of its first actions this Congress, the House Committee on Natural Resources majority chose to hold an oversight hearing targeting the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Last congress, more legislation was introduced to weaken protections for two already endangered whales—the North Atlantic right whale and the Gulf of Mexico Rice’s whale—than for any other individual species, an indicator that none of our most threatened and endangered wildlife is safe from congressional attack. 

Beyond Congress, President Trump and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum have issued a series of executive and secretarial orders that, at minimum, foreshadow broad attempts to undermine Endangered Species Act protections. 

Trump’s executive orders direct agencies to use their emergency powers to avoid Endangered Species Act responsibilities and invoke the “God Squad,” a committee empowered to consign species to extinction by finding ways to gut species protections in favor of extractive industries. Another executive order directs agencies to establish a “sunset rule” for all new and existing regulations under the Endangered Species and Marine Mammal Protection Acts, among many others, in a backward and unlawful attempt to unleash the dirtiest forms of American energy. 

Secretary Burgum has directed his agency to consider rolling back regulatory efforts to protect imperiled species. And President Trump has nominated Brian Nesvik—who has an abysmal record of protecting imperiled wildlife as director of Wyoming’s Game & Fish Department—to run the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

The full scale of Endangered Species Act attacks under the Trump administration remains to be seen, as the Fish & Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service are expected to take regulatory action to roll back protections. A rule is already in the works to constrain the definition of harm that underpins many Endangered Species Act safeguards. After just a few months, it has become clear that Trump and his allies are waging an all-out war on the Endangered Species Act and our nation’s cherished wildlife that depend on it.  

Related Issues
Wildlife

Related Content