What the USDA’s Emergency Logging Map Gets Dangerously Wrong
This isn’t just bad policy—it’s a mess.
Author
Media Contact
The new emergency logging directive from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) threatens to radically reshape how we manage the country's national forests. On paper, the directive is largely pitched as a response to wildfire risks. But in reality, it’s a sweeping mandate that fast-tracks destructive logging over nearly 60 percent of our national forest lands. With this emergency declaration, extractive logging projects will be subject to minimal environmental review, with no meaningful opportunities for public input.
This directive seeks to supercharge logging on our public lands, prioritizing timber production over the myriad values these ecosystems provide—ranging from drinking water to recreation to critical habitat for vulnerable species.
NRDC conducted an in-depth analysis of the USDA’s official map and found serious problems in both the policy and the execution.
This isn’t just bad policy—it’s a mess
- A false premise: There is no basis to declare such an emergency over this extensive scale. In fact, the memo itself states its purpose is to fulfill Trump’s directive to ramp up timber production.
- An issue of prioritization: The actions proposed would divert critical time, people, and resources from places and communities actually in imminent risk of emergency, such as from wildfire.
- Sensitive and restricted lands are caught in the crosshairs: The memo includes logging areas inside hazardous U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund sites, lands within Tribal reservation boundaries, as well as lands critical for the nation’s drinking water
- Irreplaceable ecosystems are at risk: A total of 50.3 million acres of protected wilderness areas, roadless areas, and designated critical habitat, as well as 2,300 miles of wild and scenic rivers are included in the emergency declaration map area, fast-tracking destructive projects in areas that were intentionally set aside to preserve their natural values and functions.
Learn More
Logging won’t stop wildfires—but it will do damage
Despite the administration’s claims, science shows that large-scale logging in the backcountry doesn’t prevent wildfires—and cutting down mature, fire-resistant trees can actually make the problem worse.
This plan isn’t about safety. It’s about removing environmental guardrails so that logging companies can operate with fewer constraints. The USDA memo bypasses critical environmental review, ignores wetland and species protections, and threatens to permanently damage irreplaceable ecosystems and watersheds.
Who really benefits? Not the public and not our environment
This order prioritizes industry profits over the health of our forests, communities, and climate:
- It targets 20 million acres of designated critical habitat for threatened and endangered species, and an additional nearly 350,000 acres of proposed critical habitat
- Nearly a quarter of all of the mature and old-growth forests across the United States (35 million acres) are put at risk under this memo, areas that play a critical role in carbon storage, wildfire prevention, and watershed protection
- Nearly 80,000 miles–that’s 59 percent—of National Forest System Trails cherished by outdoor enthusiasts across the country fall within potential project areas now subject to minimal environmental review and public transparency.
- 32 million acres—nearly a third of the total “emergency” area—is land that has high or very high importance for drinking water, based on data from the Forest Service’s own analysis.
- Limiting environmental review in these areas risks the clean drinking water of millions of Americans and threatens our limited remaining mature and old-growth forests, along with the priceless biodiversity that these forests support.
- It has an even wider reach than just the areas identified in the map. A mere 50 percent of the project area must be within the emergency designation in order to bypass critical environmental review and public input. This puts millions more acres of protected areas and recreational lands at risk of fast-tracked logging beyond the numbers in this analysis.
Bottom line
The USDA’s emergency map is a dangerous, inaccurate, and legally questionable attempt to fast-track logging on public lands. It’s a massive handout to the timber industry, dressed up as wildfire prevention—and it will cost us far more than it claims to save.
This analysis was originally published on April 21, 2025, and has been updated with new information and links to reflect a revised GIS layer of the memo areas put out by the Forest Service, as well as to add new data to evaluate additional impacts.
Related Content
Our Public Lands Are on the Chopping Block Again
BLM Moves to Subsidize Dirty Drilling, Cut Out the Public, and Send Taxpayers the Bill
